Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
From: ++The Commentator++ (nospam_at_no.trolls)
Date: 03/24/05
- Next message: ++The Commentator++: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Previous message: ++The Commentator++: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- In reply to: Brad Guth: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Next in thread: C Sar: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 01:02:27 -0800
Brad Guth wrote:
>
>
>
> However, the supposed very best raw 30 meter/pixel capability of the
> SMART-1 imaging absolutely sucks almost worse off than a cell-phone
> camera using those 2.2 micron/pixel CCDs.
>
>
Care to name a cell phone camera with a resolution of 2.2
microns/pixel?
Didn't think so.
Thanks for playing, bring on the next k00k spouting
dingbattery...
- Next message: ++The Commentator++: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Previous message: ++The Commentator++: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- In reply to: Brad Guth: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Next in thread: C Sar: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|