Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
From: tj Frazir (GravityPhysics_at_webtv.net)
Date: 03/25/05
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Examining Mathematical Approaches"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Mark Martin: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Next in thread: tj Frazir: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 17:54:40 -0500
5 feet into the moon the presure at 1/2 thrust is 2300 psi.
7 feet under the rocket inside the blast of an invisible high presure
plume.
earth air dont stop much of what is directed down either 15 psi or no
psi blasted direct by 2300 psi .
10 gallons of rocket fuel per second exploded 2 feet above the moon at
2300 psi 11000 * F
as the plume 2300 pounds blast into the moon as it expands sending parts
of the moon evrywhere.
11 gallons per second of ice is digging a ditch as they fly over the
moon.
The ice from the fuel forms ln befor the gas hits 0 psi and is why ice
can pass them in space.
I sonic sand blaster using ice and 7 feet under the rocket it is 2300
psi.
1/6 G on the moon .
The moon is under an argon sea that serounds the planet.
rock gives of gas.
the gas cant get off the moon .
40 miles thick at 1/6 G is the atmosphere on the moon.
How would you get more gas than that off the moon ?
Its invisible gas.
IR its not invisible and we do see it.
not enouph psi for water or any liquids.
But the gas is 1/6 G mole thick buster.
Thats far more psi than what a vickers vane will pump down to.
3/1000 psi on the moon.
the identical gas as re-entry
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Examining Mathematical Approaches"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Mark Martin: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Next in thread: tj Frazir: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
