The Big Bang's Little Problem
From: Nick (macromitch_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/26/05
- Next message: cnctutwiler_at_wmconnect.com: "Re: String Theory and Letterman"
- Previous message: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Terri knows they are killing her!!!"
- Next in thread: Morituri-|-Max: "Re: The Big Bang's Little Problem.."
- Reply: Morituri-|-Max: "Re: The Big Bang's Little Problem.."
- Reply: guskz_at_hotmail.com: "Re: The Big Bang's Little Problem"
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: The Big Bang's Little Problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 25 Mar 2005 21:51:05 -0800
If the universe started without gravity it violated the No
Boundary proposal. No curvature/gravity in the begining?
What about unification? If there was mass there was gravity.
Can't get around it.
But if that mass started as a singularity the gravity of
this universal mass would make it a black hole.
And black holes don't expand.
So if there was no gravity it was only because there was
no mass yet - as a singularity. Mass was created spread
apart and flung outward. That way the gravity of mass
can be overcome by inflation/expansion.
It can clearly be seen that space-time expanded outward
from a single point. So there was a space-time singularity
but there was no "mass" singularity.
Mitch -- Gravity is a Continuum --
- Next message: cnctutwiler_at_wmconnect.com: "Re: String Theory and Letterman"
- Previous message: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Terri knows they are killing her!!!"
- Next in thread: Morituri-|-Max: "Re: The Big Bang's Little Problem.."
- Reply: Morituri-|-Max: "Re: The Big Bang's Little Problem.."
- Reply: guskz_at_hotmail.com: "Re: The Big Bang's Little Problem"
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: The Big Bang's Little Problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
