Re: The Big Bang's Little Problem
guskz_at_hotmail.com
Date: 03/26/05
- Next message: erich: "New Efficient AC"
- Previous message: Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel: "Re: Nothing can travel faster than light"
- In reply to: Nick: "The Big Bang's Little Problem"
- Next in thread: jonathan: "Re: The Big Bang's Little Problem"
- Reply: jonathan: "Re: The Big Bang's Little Problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 26 Mar 2005 03:25:13 -0800
Nick wrote:
> If the universe started without gravity it violated the No
> Boundary proposal. No curvature/gravity in the begining?
>
I'm no science expert but:
- The big bang was called Chaos by the Greeks.
The universe may have to be viewed differently and perhaps:
- consider matter/substance only as a localised density of energy and
as an amplitude of energy from a manifestation of Newton's inertia
momentum law.
- consider gravity/magnetic forces as perhaps individual
transmission/reception frequencies where the signals move toward their
"least" restrictive path.
- consider massless light as a pertubation or resonance of vacuum
space/ether or the smallest permissible form of energy/quantum.
- consider that possibly there is no void & possibly all existance must
remain "with-in" the big bang's energy field/bubble.
- consider why 3or4 viewable dimensions why not 200.
- consider there is no energy and that it's sum total = zero which they
explain as possibly the positive & negative universe or the outcome of
Newton's action/reaction law.
- consider curvature (why 3or4 if the straight arrow of time also
curves), gravity, boundary as possibly a transmission/reception
manifestion of Newton's action/reaction law where the only void(s) (ant
thus "room/space" for travel) that is formed is through Newton's laws
on action(inertia/momentum) to which must be re-filled (curvature &
boundary) by the reaction.
- consider time(4d) = "total energy transmitted by the big bang who's
propagation velocity(time/frequency) is limitted by the "sectional 2d"
distance(span) created by the volume(why 3d) of the big bang's total
energy" (All d's are inter-related).
> What about unification? If there was mass there was gravity.
> Can't get around it.
> But if that mass started as a singularity the gravity of
> this universal mass would make it a black hole.
> And black holes don't expand.
>
> So if there was no gravity it was only because there was
> no mass yet - as a singularity. Mass was created spread
> apart and flung outward. That way the gravity of mass
> can be overcome by inflation/expansion.
>
> It can clearly be seen that space-time expanded outward
> from a single point. So there was a space-time singularity
> but there was no "mass" singularity.
> Mitch -- Gravity is a Continuum --
- Next message: erich: "New Efficient AC"
- Previous message: Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel: "Re: Nothing can travel faster than light"
- In reply to: Nick: "The Big Bang's Little Problem"
- Next in thread: jonathan: "Re: The Big Bang's Little Problem"
- Reply: jonathan: "Re: The Big Bang's Little Problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
