Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?

From: Bjoern Feuerbacher (feuerbac_at_thphys.uni-heidelberg.de)
Date: 03/02/05 

Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 17:25:59 +0100

Ken S. Tucker wrote:
> Franz Heymann wrote:
>
>>"Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@vianet.on.ca> wrote in message
>>news:1109679825.893876.17420@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> [...]
>
>>>Well ain't that pretty.
>>>Franz with the blessing of Bjeorn and Crieghton
>>>have decided a rotating electostatic dipole
>>>radiates just like a rotating bar magnetic.
>>
>>With E,D and H,B interchanged, and the occasional c stuffed in to
>>retain dimensional homogeneity.
>>
>>
>>>Well that old theory about the ground state of
>>>da Hydrogen atom not radiating, you know, details
>>>like that pesky Quantum Theory, aren't needed
>>>acording to the 3 wise men. They've pronounced
>>>otherwise.
>>
>>At the moment we are talking classical physics, just in case your
>>meagre intellect has failed to notice it.
>
>
> Oh, Franz made a new rule, no knowledge past
> 1900 allowed, no SR, GR or QT.

Wrong. That's not what he actually said.

Thanks for confirming his remark about your intellect.

>>> They say rotating dipoles radiate no matter what.
>>
>>Yes.
>>
>>
>>>So far the've managed to eliminate Maxwell's EM,
>>>SR, GR and QT,
>>
>>No.
>>
>>
>>>damn my TEEVEE just blinked off,
>>>they must be right.
>>
>>They were and are.
>>
>>
>>>You'all better stop shaving
>>>and wrap a towel around you head to fit in.
>>>Me thinks JM may be absorbed by "the body".
>>
>>Tucker, everybody on the ng already knows you are a moron, so stop
>>bragging about it.
>
>
> Better More On than More OFF.
>
> Franz, you have no current or current density "J"
> in Maxwell's phraseology to create the "displacement
> current" &E/&t, in an isolated bar magnet.

As was already discussed, that is not needed.

> Furthermore QT and GR also predict no radiation.

Wrong. QT is rather irrelevant to the question, and you
constantly misapply GR.

> Ken
> PS: this is getting boring and circular.

Indeed. Hint: get an education, then the discussion might
get better.

Bye,
Boern

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Can you decrypt this?
    ... inside the bankruptcy's darkness. ... He may display fast if Felix's ... pride isn't romantic. ... What did Zakariya jump in response to all the ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?
    ... > Franz Heymann wrote: ... >>Tucker, You are behaving like a thirteen year old dreading the ... >>approach of pubescence. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?
    ... Franz Heymann wrote: ... > Then you are as wrong as Ken Tucker. ... a rotating bar magnet will radiate out ... in outer space, (I'm saying outer space ...
    (sci.physics)