Re: The Matter of "Dark Matter

From: robert j. kolker (nowhere_at_nowhere.net)
Date: 03/27/05 

Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 12:50:02 -0500

robert j. kolker wrote:

>
>
> Sam Wormley wrote:
>
>> Einsteinhoax wrote:
>>
>>> The Matter of "Dark Matter["]
>>>
>>
>>
>> GTR fruitful tool to map Dark Matter!
>
>
> Assuming that it exists and is not merely an ad hod to save the theory.
>
> Is the Dark Matter hypothesis more like Neptune/Uranis or like
> Mercury/Vulcan?

I read the reference -Dark Matter, Evidence, Candidates and
Constraints-. It is clear to me now that D.M. is not some trivial ad hoc
but a serious hypothesis which may be redeemed by substantial empirical
means. The matter is not settled, but it looks like there may be "marrow
in the bones". There is much work to be done before D.M. is tossed away
(assuming it is not confirmed). I am assured that D.M. is in competent
hands.

Bob Kolker

Relevant Pages
Quantcast