Re: Vacuum - The Final Frontier
From: The Ghost In The Machine (ewill_at_sirius.athghost7038suus.net)
Date: 03/28/05
- Next message: RP: "Re: What keeps electrons spinning around their nucleus?"
- Previous message: cnctutwiler_at_wmconnect.com: "Re: price-to-earnings ratios and fundamental analysis"
- In reply to: Uncle Al: "Re: Vacuum - The Final Frontier"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: Vacuum - The Final Frontier"
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: Vacuum - The Final Frontier"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 05:00:03 GMT
In sci.physics, Uncle Al
<UncleAl0@hate.spam.net>
wrote
on Sun, 27 Mar 2005 17:16:35 -0800
<42475AF3.CB8EBAEC@hate.spam.net>:
> "John C. Polasek" wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 08:40:24 -0800, Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >"John C. Polasek" wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 27 Mar 2005 04:44:09 -0800, "Jack" <chemphysicsdude@yahoo.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> Jack, I have worked all this out in my Dual Space theory. It is
>> >> presented in some detail in my "permitivity" paper on my website
>> >> http://www.dualspace.net.
>> >[snip]
>> >
>> >John, you have adopted an empirically unsupportable crank viewpoint.
>> Al, read it and weep. That's how it all works.
>> John Polasek
>
> Eat it, John - if you have no empirical support you have no survivable
> theory. My first hemiparity Eotvos experiment, P3(2)21 quartz vs.
> fused silica, did NOT give a clean null. This is the first time it
> has happened in 400+ years of Equivalence Principle testing. All
> other reputable experiments have been clean nulls within experimental
> error. The work was done 6850 miles distant by folks I have never
> met, in fully qualified equipment by prior demonstration, using
> materials and fabrication processes independent of me, by the book
> SOP. "There is a worm in Eden, a worm a worm..."
>
> The full parity Eotvos experiment, P3(1)21 quartz vs. P3(2)21 quartz,
> is getting ready for execution. I fully expect there will be
> demonstrated a reproducible 6+ sigma Equivalence Principle parity
> violation, thus falsifying both General Relativity (metric gravitation
> overall) and Lorentz Invariance (isotropy of space re chirality).
> Affine gravitation will be validated. Lattice quantum gravitation
> will be falsified, 80% of M-theory will be falsified.
>
> Parity violation of the Equivalence Principle by empirical
> demonstation, John, at will anywhere on Earth. Uncle Al doesn't
> tolerate bull*** ink on paper. Uncle Al is an experimentalist.
> Physical reality is Uncle Al's ally, and a powerful ally it is.
>
> If the full parity Eotvos experiment nulls, so be it. That will also
> be the honest result. No bull*** either way.
>
Dumb question: what will replace SR or GR or both, then?
Obviously not c'=c+v, but is there a "theory in the wings"
prepared, or are you waiting for more data? If so,
undef what conditions would the theories be nearly equal,
a la Galileo/Newton and SR being nearly equal for v << c?
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/eotvos.htm
comes up on a Google search for "affine gravity parity theory Eotvos",
so you might be famous after all this... :-)
In any event, it's a heck of a result.
-- #191, ewill3@earthlink.net It's still legal to go .sigless.
- Next message: RP: "Re: What keeps electrons spinning around their nucleus?"
- Previous message: cnctutwiler_at_wmconnect.com: "Re: price-to-earnings ratios and fundamental analysis"
- In reply to: Uncle Al: "Re: Vacuum - The Final Frontier"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: Vacuum - The Final Frontier"
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: Vacuum - The Final Frontier"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]