Re: What about boats which go underwater
From: Mr.G (mikelg_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/30/05
- Next message: tj Frazir: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Previous message: newedana: "Re: A Realistic Hypothesis by Elmo Mottard"
- In reply to: Wonko The Sane: "Re: What about boats which go underwater"
- Next in thread: Wayne Lundberg: "Re: What about boats which go underwater"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:59:55 GMT
-- Mr.G Nam et ipsa scientia potestas est "Wonko The Sane" <Wonko@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:6An2e.10995$TZ.7981@okepread06... > > "habshi" <habshi@anony.com> wrote in message > news:4249d0c4.2249654@news.clara.net... >> I meant some kind of invention which would make an inflatable >> draping for a boat to convert it into a submarine so it could continue >> underwater in rough weather. > The cover would behave like a shrink wrap for the items on deck > as soon as it was more than a few inches below the surface. > If you had a sub/boat/shallow submarine with watertight hull and very > reliable > bouancy control you might be good to 100 feet or so. Your cover might > be good for lazy people to avoid having to stow deck items. > > To dodge really hairy storms you need to go down about 500 feet, > so you need a real submarine anyway. > That shrink wrap effect would also turn cars and trucks into very small metal balls. 1200 feet is the limit for modern subs. Avoiding a storm is pointless, once you are under water. You will still have wave effects, that move you around. Mr.G
- Next message: tj Frazir: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Previous message: newedana: "Re: A Realistic Hypothesis by Elmo Mottard"
- In reply to: Wonko The Sane: "Re: What about boats which go underwater"
- Next in thread: Wayne Lundberg: "Re: What about boats which go underwater"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|