Re: Photons/Universe or Neutrinos/Universe

From: Brad Guth (ieisbradguth_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/02/05 

Date: 2 Mar 2005 13:22:42 -0800

I'm going out on my proverbial limb by way of suggesting a
universe/sphere of 24e9 ly radius. Since no one actually knows for
sure, I'm fairly safe in assuming just about anything, one of which is
another assumption as to the cosmic Oort zone of our universe that has
to be worth something, and of whatever's considered dark matter and
even of dark energy (perhaps blackholes) has to be worth considerably
more than whatever our universe Oort zone has to contribute, all of
which needs to be balanced against anti-matter.

Sphere r = 24e9 ly = volume of 5.79e31 ly3
5.79e31 * 8.467e47 = 49.024e78 m3/universe

If we assign an arbitrary average value of 1e12 atoms/m3

1e12 * 49.024e78 = 49.024e90 atoms/universe

Doubling the population count as for regarding anti-matter and we've
got a new ballpark worth of 98.048e90 atoms to contend with. Thus my
1e100 atoms/universe is a wee bit on the high side but, not nearly as
great as some have calculated.

(neutron star nucleons/m3 = 1e45, nucleus/neutron star core = 1e18
kg/m3)

Since there's never been a recession in the estimate of the universe,
and not that any of this should ever matter, as such I'd favor towards
the nice round distribution as being 1e100 worth of atoms.

Obviously the event horizon of a blackhole or possibly vortex into a
wormhole that's conceivably providing a conduit between universes, as
such the population of atoms within the event horizon zone could
conceivably fall to one atom/m3. However, since photons are somewhat 2D
(quantum string like) and thereby no limits as to their length or
frequency and, since there's obviously no 3d volume aspects getting in
the way, thus the continuing argument as based upon the populations of
said photons/atom could be as great as 1e100 shouldn't give any reason
to fear or to discredit, only as to ponder the potential worth of
photons being in the vast majority of all that represents any portion
of any given universe.

So, why are we still not fully utilizing photons for the benefit of
humanity?

This purely subjective postulation of 1e100 photons/atom doesn't even
sound all that impressive unless there's a nearby blackhole or likeness
of dark-matter and/or dark-energy zone that's actually containing
perhaps a core of anti-matter that's merely surrounded by a somewhat
considerable swarm of said photons, as now we're into a somewhat
intense population of those photons that can't persay survive within
the realm of the atom, nor even safely pass through the inner realm of
the atom which supposedly represents a sphere diameter of 1e-10.

Obviously if a blackhole were purely that of normal matter (except lots
of it), as such there would not be all that much available space for
the likes of photons to coexist, as I've been informed that the inner
realm of the atom isn't available to the photon, and in fact I believe
there's another atomic surround field of energy that's somewhat of an
atomic off-limits DMZ and/or FIFO packet node-like packet transfer
energy field relationship as to benefiting the photon, thus it seems
reasonable that a normal photon can only reside momentarily nearby any
given atom.

It has been suggested by others that the space or volume of whatever's
anti-matter isn't nearly the size or volume of the surrounding matter,
thus a seed of anti-matter might be all it takes as to collect that
swarm of photons into becoming nearly-resting, so as to representing
dark-matter and/or dark-energy that's similar if not entirely what a
blackhole is. Thus I'm suggesting that gravity may not be the one and
only root cause or focus of a given blackhole.

Apparently the 'neutrino' is at best slightly 3D, but also somewhat
quantum string 2D like, as similar to that of a sub-microscopic photon,
although clearly much shorter than the diameter of an atom(1e-10) as
having been suggested by 'b...@ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu' as slight as
'1e-43 of the size of the neutron', in which case I can understand how
the neutrino as such a sub-microscopic particle of such slight 3D
consideration could coexist about the likes of anti-matter and even
within the ream of an atom without self-destructing along the way,
whereas the vast bulk of photons are generally longer than several
diameters of a given atom, thus can not chance a through-pass of any
such atom without consequences.

However, my closing argument is having to do with these photons
efficiently coexisting with atoms, such as 425 nm photons coexisting
with the available atoms of space between planets that could be as
little populated as 1e9 atoms/m3 and otherwise 1e6 between start
systems, by way of somewhat AI(artificial intelligence) alignments and
subsequent spinnings of said atoms in order to create and sustain the
necessary laser beam of packet nodes, and that of photons thereby
utilizing atoms as their FIFO transponders aligned between planets
and/or star systems seems like a rather efficient alternative to the
sorts of RF/microwave photons that are so extremely long and thereby
easily distorted, diverted and/or consumed along the way, in so much as
an RF/microwave might not even be capable of spinning atoms nor
aligning atoms as to any measurable benefit, but representing more of
an enormously long 2D string that's having to transfer it's load of
energy and slight mass through a virtual gauntlet of space that's chuck
full of physical debris and otherwise the sorts of free atoms that
aren't actually helping. That plus the fact that the focused energy of
a given stream of 425 nm photons can be a million fold better off than
any focused microwave energy, whereas this seems to only further
suggest that the usage of the 425 nm photon is superior in nearly every
conceivable manner to that of the RF/microwave alternatives.

QUESTIONS:
What's it going to take getting a few worthy laser cannons focused upon
a given planet, and otherwise upon a given star system?

I believe 0.5 milliradian is somewhat off-the-shelf, so what if we
started off with 0.05 milliradian, how much energy?

Reverse OSETI
Obviously the ideal location for such a laser cannon transmitter is
deep space, or at least that of situated upon our moon. Unfortunately,
there's still no available technology for getting anything even
robotically deployed upon the moon, and the R&D cost of creating
another space platform that's suitable for that of laser cannon usage
is asking a bit much since we've just blown another cold-war trillion
bucks/euros and managed to set humanity (minus all those we've managed
to get exterminated) back at least another decade. So, that leaves us
with what we've already bought and paid for (much of which several
times over) that's existing right under our dumbfounded noses.

Regards, Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm

Relevant Pages

  • Re: What before big bang?
    ... for photons, ... > universe is directly dependent on the one which preceded it! ... Only energy and momentum are. ... Collisions of photons can not produce neutrinos (at ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Question about Vacuum Gravity
    ... > energy, expressed as virtual particles, is a non-zero amount, ... It doesn't say anything about connections to another Universe. ... For three photons, the two annihilating particles ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Question about Vacuum Gravity
    ... > energy, expressed as virtual particles, is a non-zero amount, ... >> Notice that he is only requiring that the matter leave this Universe, ... VIRTUAL microwave photons are ALSO going to be ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Whats the process that causes sparks?
    ... The kinetic energy of a flint and steel transferring ... agitate atoms when, e.g., you strike flint with steel. ... observers standing around a flint and steel being struck together. ... fewer photons, that not all observers see the spark? ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: What before big bang?
    ... > for a Hot Universe, page 78, regarding the radiation dominated era: ... *really* was *no* matter! ... Its average energy is roughly equal to ... > fourth power of the temperature, just as for photons. ...
    (sci.physics)
Loading