Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!
From: Ian St. John (istjohn_at_noemail.usa)
Date: 03/02/05
- Next message: Ian St. John: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Previous message: John Sefton: "Re: Article: Most distant galaxy cluster yet is revealed"
- In reply to: Fred J. McCall: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Next in thread: Rand Simberg: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Reply: Rand Simberg: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Reply: Fred J. McCall: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:53:41 -0500
Fred J. McCall wrote:
> "Ian St. John" <istjohn@noemail.usa> wrote:
>
>> Rand Simberg wrote:
>>> On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:29:34 -0500, in a place far, far away, "Ian
>>> St. John" <istjohn@noemail.usa> made the phosphor on my monitor
>>> glow in such a way as to indicate that:
>>>
>>>>>> So W never has claimed Iraq has WMD?
>>>>>
>>>>> W has never claimed that "Iraq has Nuclear, Biological and
>>>>> Chemical WMD."
>>>>
>>>> I would suggest a visit to your mental health expert. You are
>>>> obviously not dealing with reality very well.
>>>
>>> I deal with reality quite, well, just as I deal with your lunacy.
>>
>> Denial of reality is lunacy.
>
> Recognizing your problem is the first step to getting better, Ian.
>
>> http://www.ceip.org/files/pdf/Iraq3Intro.pdf
> :"From Mr. Bush's first detailed case for the war on
>> October 7, 2002, to the declaration of war on March
>> 17, 2003, the purpose is always clear: "Saddam
>> Hussein must disarm himself-or for the sake of
>> peace, we will lead a coalition to disarm him."
>
> And you think that is the same as the claim "Iraq and Nuclear,
> Biological and Chemical WMD"?
The claim was that Iraq had WMDs fitting the bill as 'nuclear, biological
and chemical'. Are you trying to sound like an idiot or is it natural? Their
was no call to 'disarm' Iraq of conventional arms. Nor would this have been
legal justification for war either by U.S. or international law. The claims
were clear and your delusional claims are not pretty.
>
>> Ergo, you fit the definition of a lunatic.
>
> Well, either you fit it better than he does or else you're merely
> illiterate (or exceedingly stupid).
To remember history doesn't take much more than honesty. Obviously, you are
either delusional or dishonest.
>
>> As to me, you known nothing except that I have exposed your
>> irrational posts.
>
> We know what you've written. What you've written (as above) shows
> that you are a lying loon.
As a reaction to having your lies exposed, this is completely silly.
- Next message: Ian St. John: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Previous message: John Sefton: "Re: Article: Most distant galaxy cluster yet is revealed"
- In reply to: Fred J. McCall: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Next in thread: Rand Simberg: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Reply: Rand Simberg: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Reply: Fred J. McCall: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
