Re: Feedback? Outline of Dr. E's Upcoming Paper on The Theory Of Moving Dimensions: Time is Moving Relative to Space

jollyrogership_at_yahoo.com
Date: 03/04/05 

Date: 4 Mar 2005 04:14:21 -0800

Geraldine Hobba wrote:
> <jollyrogership@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1109874133.181596.111300@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> > Yes. But what does this metric mean?
> >
> > Philosophical and Physical Barriers to Moving Dimensions
> > Many trained physicists have a knee-jerk reaction that the time
> > dimension cannot be moving because "dimensions cannot move."
>
> No - they have a knee jerk reaction to crap.
>
> > First
> > off, since the universe is expanding, space-time is also expanding,
> > demonstrating that dimensions are moving and expanding.
>
> Your logic is incorrect - you fail to correctly distinguish between
'moving'
> and 'expanding'. BTW recent evidence suggests space-time may not be
> expanding.

In order for something to expand, it must also be able to move.

>
> > Secondly,
> > general relativity demonstrates that massive objects warp
space-time,
> > meaning that as a massive object moves though space-time, it
stretches
> > space-time, showing again that space-time in one area can move, or
> > deform, relative to space-time in another area.
>
> Your logic is incorrect.

How is my logic incoorect? Where is it incorrect? I don't believe
you.

>
> > Thus there exist
> > neither philosophical nor physical barriers to the concept of
moving
> > dimensions, but for artificial ones within lazy minds.
>
> What exists is your inabilty to reason properly.
>
> >
> > Rather than just accepting the minus sign in front of the c^2t^2 as
> > being there because it "just is there," this paper aims to look at
> > the deeper reality which gives rise to the minus sign.
> >
>
> The deeper reality of erroneous thinking. BTW physicists already
know why
> the sign in front of the time component of the metric is different -
you get
> senseless physics if it is not.
>
> > A physicist's
> > job is not to accept things on blind faith, nor only ask questions
that
> > are allowed to be asked, but a physicist's job is to wonder.
> >
>
> A physicists job is also to reason properly - something you avoid.
>
> > And
> > that wonder, which seems all but forgotten in the bureaucratization
of
> > modern physics, leads to the deeper beauty. "Imagination is more
> > important than knowledge," was how one physicist put it.
>
> Being able to reason properly is most important of all.
>
> Bill

Relevant Pages
Quantcast