Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Wolf Kirchmeir (wwolfkir_at_sympatico.ca)
Date: 03/04/05
- Next message: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Neil W Rickert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:38:47 -0500
Lester Zick wrote:
[...]
>
> Not necessarily if the origin of time is the oldest. Then we have to
> consider that the origin of time is only diametrically opposed to an
> observer through special pleading and if not there is an anisotropic
> distribution of red shifts with respect to the origin of time.
[...]
Do you by any chance know of or have any data that show anisotropoic
redshifts (apart from locally caused variations, such as is observed
from opposite sides of a galaxy seen edge on)?
Just thought I'd ask....
- Next message: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Neil W Rickert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|