Re: GOD=G_uv REPLY TO DEAN
From: Gary Eickmeier (geickmei_at_tampabay.rr.com)
Date: 03/05/05
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Loop quantum gravity - loop quantum electrodynamics"
- In reply to: georgehammond_at_hotmail.com: "Re: GOD=G_uv REPLY TO DEAN"
- Next in thread: Apocalypso Now: "Re: GOD=G_uv REPLY TO DEAN"
- Reply: Apocalypso Now: "Re: GOD=G_uv REPLY TO DEAN"
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv REPLY TO DEAN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 16:07:06 GMT
georgehammond@hotmail.com wrote:
> georgehammond@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>>Stew Dean wrote:
> [Stew Dean]
> Even by you definition I am right because through observation we can
> see the world existed prior to our apperance.
> That's the point dumbwit.
>
> [Hammond]
> NO... IMBECILE... that's only "retrospective existence".
> I.e "through observation" we can confirm NOW that "a million year
> history 'came into existence" when we appeared 100k years ago".....
> but 100,000 years ago there WERE NO HUMANS TO MAKE SUCH AN
> OBSERVATION.... hence 100k years ago it could not be said that
> "the world existed a million years ago"...and:
>
> THAT IS THE POINT INBECILE!
The truth is, nothing existed before George Hammond. Everything else, to
George, is just retrospective existence. I mean, how can George know
that everything didn't just pop into existence a moment before he was born?
Gary Eickmeier
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Loop quantum gravity - loop quantum electrodynamics"
- In reply to: georgehammond_at_hotmail.com: "Re: GOD=G_uv REPLY TO DEAN"
- Next in thread: Apocalypso Now: "Re: GOD=G_uv REPLY TO DEAN"
- Reply: Apocalypso Now: "Re: GOD=G_uv REPLY TO DEAN"
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv REPLY TO DEAN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|