Re: What really is "Light" (assuming SR is correct)??
From: phoenix (photonixx_at_go.com)
Date: 03/06/05
- Next message: cteasd5941_at_gmail.com: "Re: Star that looks like a planet"
- Previous message: max: "Re: CNN tanking as Fox News surges"
- In reply to: Sam Wormley: "Re: What really is "Light" (assuming SR is correct)??"
- Next in thread: Morituri-|-Max: "Re: What really is "Light" (assuming SR is correct)??"
- Reply: Morituri-|-Max: "Re: What really is "Light" (assuming SR is correct)??"
- Reply: Brad Guth: "Re: What really is "Light" (assuming SR is correct)??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 6 Mar 2005 06:38:24 -0800
Sam Wormley wrote:
> phoenix wrote:
> > Assuming SR is correct. There is something very
> > strange about "light".
> >
>
> It's not just light but everything including gravitation... the
> limitation is in the fundamental structure of spacetime to which
> light (photons) and everything else are constrained by c.
So the alternating electric and magnetic fields or em
fields propagating in space is related to the structure
of space/time and indirectly to relativity... hmm...
I wonder why are things like that and there is no Aether
which can makes things simpler.
Anyway. I hope Feynman Lectures 3 Vol Book sets can explain
them completely because I just ordered those books a while
ago.
Thanks for the advance tips anyway.
P.
- Next message: cteasd5941_at_gmail.com: "Re: Star that looks like a planet"
- Previous message: max: "Re: CNN tanking as Fox News surges"
- In reply to: Sam Wormley: "Re: What really is "Light" (assuming SR is correct)??"
- Next in thread: Morituri-|-Max: "Re: What really is "Light" (assuming SR is correct)??"
- Reply: Morituri-|-Max: "Re: What really is "Light" (assuming SR is correct)??"
- Reply: Brad Guth: "Re: What really is "Light" (assuming SR is correct)??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]