Re: List of Cranks here
From: Greysky (greyskynospam_at_sbcglobal.net)
Date: 03/07/05
- Next message: mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu: "Re: Prism & Light Speed, Dispersion, etc."
- Previous message: Bilge: "Re: What really is "Light" (assuming SR is correct)??"
- In reply to: phoenix: "List of Cranks here"
- Next in thread: Y.Porat: "Re: List of Cranks here"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 06:03:32 GMT
"phoenix" <photonixx@go.com> wrote in message
news:1110154957.425057.212520@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Can we have a complete list of cranks here.
>
> 1. Fusioneer
> 2. Greysky<<< WTF? If I am on your list, I wanna be #1!
> 3. newedena
> 4. Y.Porat
> 5. Thomson
> 6. Ken Seto
> 7. TomGee
> 8. Smart Model
> 9. Retic
> 10. John Sefton
> 11. Freddifix (?)
> 12. (who else)
"Phoenix" - Is this really your list or is it one cribbed from one of the
other drippingily putrescent hemorrhoidal personalities on this ng?
>
>
> Ok. Cranks. How many of you have read this book
> "Feynman Lectures on Physics 3 Vol set"??
Yes. I recommend *everyone* get the Feynamn Lectures. The more you read, the
more there is to read. My only wish is that I was able to sit in on the
actual lectures themselves. As it is, I recommend paying the extra money for
the hardbound set, as it will not fall apart on you like the paper bound
editions can and frequently do. I also second MTW for some insightful views
on general relativity.
>
> You guys keep committing very basic mistakes that
> Heymann kept on correcting. It's very frustrating.
> How can you take apart the Standard Model if you
> are not veteran in it?? We know the Standard Model
> is not complete and something can turn it into a subset.
> But to enhance it, we must be adept in the in and
> out of Standard Model so as to be able to change
> it successfully.
So then why did I make your list? Did you even bother reading my web site?
If so you will know I don't want to take apart the standard model. You do
know that don't you? In all the *many years* I have been calling for a
reintrepretation of QM, there has been not a single refutation of my basic
ideas. Not one. That should tell you something.
>
> So, I recommened cranks to read up some basic textbooks
> such as Feynman's and be familiar with all the concepts
> before spewing horse manure as Heymann love to call it.
> It's getting frustrating to waste time reading rubbish
> every morning.
>
So you are a Heymann acolyte, huh? A vast empty ocean bashing against a
sterile beachhead. Like the oceans on Titan.
Greysky
www.allocations.cc
Learn how to build a FTL radio.
- Next message: mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu: "Re: Prism & Light Speed, Dispersion, etc."
- Previous message: Bilge: "Re: What really is "Light" (assuming SR is correct)??"
- In reply to: phoenix: "List of Cranks here"
- Next in thread: Y.Porat: "Re: List of Cranks here"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
