Re: Physics and metaphysics

From: Virgil (ITSnetNOTcom#virgil_at_COMCAST.com)
Date: 03/08/05 

Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:45:47 -0700

In article <KN-dnZp94PdUQLDfRVn-1Q@comcast.com>,
 Atheistagnostic <atheistagnostic@nospam.net> wrote:

> Virgil wrote:
> > In article <APednW0ujOhocbHfRVn-3g@comcast.com>,
> > Atheistagnostic <atheistagnostic@nospam.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Virgil wrote:
> >>
> >>>In article <ksadnWSCGuGzaLbfRVn-sA@comcast.com>,
> >>> Atheistagnostic <atheistagnostic@nospam.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Virgil wrote:

> >>>>
> >>>>>... Simple Septic has proposed that gods are impossible ...
> >>>>
> >>>>That's a lie.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Actually, Simple Septic, under several aliases, has often claimed (in
> >>>response to suggestions that there might be a god or that gods are not
> >>>known to be impossible) "False, there are no such things"
> >>
> >>That's not an assertion
> >
> > Then let us by all means ignore it as it should be ignored.
>
> So you want the denials
> ignored

No. I want things that do not claim to be true ignored.

Either claim that "False, there are no such things" is true or withdraw
it from consideration.