Re: big bang ?
From: Nick (macromitch_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/09/05
- Next message: Kevin Gowen: "How forces work"
- Previous message: cteasd5941_at_gmail.com: "Re: Star that looks like a planet"
- In reply to: Dave P.: "Re: big bang ?"
- Next in thread: Dave P.: "Re: big bang ?"
- Reply: Dave P.: "Re: big bang ?"
- Reply: Mitchell Jones: "Re: big bang ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 8 Mar 2005 17:34:53 -0800
Dave P. wrote:
> On 7 Mar 2005 23:04:27 -0800, "Nick" <macromitch@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> >>Specifically, if you believe that everything must have a "creator,"
> >>why doesn't that apply to God? And if it does, how do we avoid
concluding
> >>that Supergod must have existed, to create God? On the other hand,
if
> >>we give God a special dispensation and allow that he may have
always
> >>existed, then what need do we have for the God hypothesis, since in
> >>that case the universe itself may have always existed?
>
The Uncreated Creator too hard for you?
>
> I agree with Mr. Jones. If one can accept that God exists without the
> need of a creator, then it is just as easy to accept that the
universe
> can exist without the need of a creator... especially so, since there
> is no evidence of any God, the creator.
>
> Dave P.
The rationalization of the atheists.
The universe came from somewhere. That is what the Big Bang is about -
a begining. So you must think that a mindless lump is the creator
then Dave? That's where the universe came from?
... Another moron.
- Next message: Kevin Gowen: "How forces work"
- Previous message: cteasd5941_at_gmail.com: "Re: Star that looks like a planet"
- In reply to: Dave P.: "Re: big bang ?"
- Next in thread: Dave P.: "Re: big bang ?"
- Reply: Dave P.: "Re: big bang ?"
- Reply: Mitchell Jones: "Re: big bang ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
