Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?

From: Bjoern Feuerbacher (feuerbac_at_thphys.uni-heidelberg.de)
Date: 03/09/05 

Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 10:24:21 +0100

Ken S. Tucker wrote:
> Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote:
>
>>Ken S. Tucker wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>>Anyone can adopt the *handle*, "Bjoern Feuerbacher"
>>>too, that's the great thing about the net, you can
>>>be anyone you want.
>>
>>I notice that you conveniently ignored my other post,
>>where I suggested to you to go to the homepage of the
>>institute where I work, go to the page which lists the
>>people working there:
>><http://www.pci.uni-heidelberg.de/tc/html/people1.html>,
>>get the mail adress of "Dr. Bjoern Feuerbacher" from there,
>>and then simply mail him and *ask* him if he is the one
>>discussing with you on sci.physics.
>
>
> Tried, it didn't work. ((dynamix@uniserve.com , x=c)).
> ...

I got a message from "Ken & Lynn" (dynamics@uniserve.com)
and replied to it. That was probable from you?

I also got a mail from someone named "John Park" and replied to
it, too:
***begin quote***
Hello,

          Since Ken S. Tucker claimed your e-mail didn't work, I
thought I'd
test it myself. You are the Bjoern Feuerbacher who debates with him
(and shows a fair amount of patience) on sci.physics, aren't you?

         --John Park

P.S. Feel free to quote this on sci. phys.
***end quote***

>>>Why do you post?
>>
>>When people honestly ask questions, I answer them in order
>>to help and educate them.
>>
>>When people keep posting nonsense, I correct them in order
>>to educate them, or more probably some lurkers, since such
>>people in general are ineducable.
>
>
> Do you have a teaching degree?

What exactly do you mean with "teaching degree"?

I am not yet "habilitiert", if you mean that. But I have taught
several groups of students and lots of pupils already - and most
were satisfied.

>>>IIRC Prof Sawyer and I studied together inter-
>>>mittently from 1969-1973.
>>
>>I meant in which grade.
>>Also, you did not answer my question for the "where".
>
>
> Gr.11, U of T, his apartment, then his new house,
> in Scarboro, where I lived.

 From what you wrote some days ago, I thought you dropped out
after grade 6? So how were you able to study with Prof. Sawyer
in grade 11?

Or did I misunderstand you, and you dropped out only much later?

>>>this is an NG and not (obviously) an educational
>>>forum.
>>
>>I think a big reason for sci.physics to exist is to educate
>>(or, more to the point, to correct misunderstandings and
>>errors, and to help understanding problems).
>
>
> How egalitarian of you, strange reason.

I don't see what's "egalitarian" about that. Is this supposed
to be a (bad!) joke?

>>See e.g. the old discussion about your claim that "energy is
>>invariant".
>
>
> And you claimed to wear pink panties.

Well, that's now definitely a bad joke. So you have arrived now at the
stage of merely taking cheap shots at me. Interesting.

Bye,
Bjoern

Quantcast