Re: re:Quantum Mechanics according to Mark Mccutcheon

From: Q-on (physicsofchi_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/10/05 

Date: 9 Mar 2005 20:04:22 -0800

josephdkorinek wrote:
> While I will admit that I have not been privvy to the entire thread,
I
> must confess that I am take aback at the lack of serious dicussion by
> those responding to the arguments made concerning Mark McCutcheon.

Joseph,

Type "cinquirer mccutcheon" in the goggle search and you
would come up with many previous thread about Mark Mucutcheon
"The Final Theory" where it was put up for scrutiny and got
debunked point by point here in sci.physics, etc.

Mucutcheon stuff is crap. The book becomes best seller now
because majority of the populations are uneducated in physics.
I'd give an example of the crap he wrote.

Mccutcheon wrote in page 281 of his book:

"This bullet-like theory of light has sizable problems, which can
be seen by observing the behavior of light passing through a
transparent material, such as glass. When an actual bullet
passes through a material it is slowed down and emerges from
the material at this slower speed; the bullet cannot speed
up of its own accord to return to its previous speed once it
leaves the material. Yet, light slows down when it passes
from air into glass, then returns to its original speed upon
exit. This behavior is only partially explainable in today's
science by considering that photons would zigzag as they bounce
off the atoms within the glass, causing them to take a longer,
more winding path that effectively slows their forward progress
within the glass....."

You know why it is full of crap. The real explanation why
light *apparently slowed" down in the medium is because of
the following as the Old Man wrote:

"As light passes through matter, the photons interact with
the atoms of the medium, being repeatedly absorbed
(destroyed) and re-emitted (created).

In between interactions, the new photons travel at the
invariant speed of light, but each interaction introduces a
time lag and causes a cumulative phase-shift in the
composite electromagnetic wave.".

See how Mccutcheon crap debunked by Old Man? All the rest
of the book can be debunked similarly. If one has time. One
can write an anti-Mccutcheon book especially now that his
book has become best seller. You can get tens of thousands
of readers and earn a lot amidst educating the ignoring.

You know what. There is a big possibility Standard Model is
in the right path. Over 100 years ago before even before
Rutherford. Seers have viewed protons composing of 3 quarks.
Not only that. The Seers saw the quarks as composing of 3
monopoles connected by strings, etc. as well as how it is
connected to the Higgs Field. A theoretical physicist in
England called Stephen Phillips spent 25 years researching
about this. See his site.

http://smphillips.8m.com/index.html

It's all detailed in his book "ESP of Quarks & Superstrings".

In my own investigation. Very advanced seers could also be
seeing the monopoles components of the strings but I don't
have close access to them. The friend seers I know use micro-psi
vision to witness what may be virtual particles being produced
between 2 particles giving rise to the forces. Yes,
clairvoyancy is exempted from the Heisenberg Uncertainty
Principle because the probe used to be them are more subtle.

Last week. We studied the magnetic fields between permanent
magnets. Although the seer can detect etheric forces between
the atoms. After one week of studying it, he concluded the
attraction is not caused by the ethers but something more
physically. Again. Standard Model seems to be supported.
This is all just preliminary of course, but it appears there
is no Aether. What is more possible is the dynamic space
time uses subtle energy or fluid like contents but the
behavior of relative frames is ruled by Einstein Relativity.

With quarks, superstrings, higg field, virtual particles, etc.
being very possibly real. Standard Model may be on the right
path. Qi physics is now in the same category as search for Dark
Matter, Vaccum Engineering, etc. because qi is nothing but
dynamic energy density with holographic representation or
simply "energy field" of some aspect of the vacuum. Qi
research belongs to exotic physics research.

To be updated with qi physics. Interested parties must
first be well acquainted with Quantum Chromodynamics, QFT,
Vaccuum Physics and must study at depth the theories of
the superconductors and the Higgs field (remembering there
is analogy about Higgs and Superconduction principles). Now
connect them all to vaccumm and Bohm Physics and beyond
(such as possibly M-theory or alternative) and you would see
the tip of the iceberg of qi physics.

If a person is trapped with Mccutcheon physics. He may
never understand TOE because qi physics uses the Standard
Model as subset to it. Right now. I decide to study these
subsets first (such as QCD). Without it. I can't even begin
to comprehend qi physics.

Q-on

Quantcast