Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Lester Zick (lesterDELzick_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 03/11/05
- Next message: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: ? Measuring eigenvalues"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:49:54 GMT
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:38:46 -0500, "robert j. kolker"
<nowhere@nowhere.net> in comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
>Albert Wagner wrote:
[. . .]
>Materialism and reductionism are empirically falsifiable, so they are
>not religious principles. They are empistemological principles based on
>experience with techniques that have produced the best results (so far).
Technically materialism and reductionism are philosophical prejudices
and not empirically falsifiable.
Regards - Lester
- Next message: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: ? Measuring eigenvalues"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
