Re: Acceleration With and Without Rate

From: Nick (macromitch_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/11/05 

Date: 11 Mar 2005 12:20:51 -0800

jahn wrote:
> "Nick" <macromitch@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1110514105.366035.224730@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> > Strength of gravity can be defined by weight.
> > The strength of gravity in weight is an acceleration - without any
rate
> > - multiplied by mass.
> > There is no motion or change in motion in gravity's weight.
> > So if there are no changes there can be no rate - to no change.
> >
> > When you remove the rate from the Equivalence Principle you are
left
> > with a more general definition of acceleration. Without the rate
you
> > only have a limited acceleration. It happens to be the constant we
know
> > as the speed of light. The limit is less than a light speed change.
> >
> > The Equivalence Principle must become in this way more general -
> > a more general definition of acceleration.
> > The strength of gravity in weight is thus limited.
> >
> > The other side of the Equivalence Principle applies to
> > an accelerating frame which changes velocity in space.
> > The rate of change applies here.
> >
> > But in gravity the acceleration equivalence for weight is
> > timeless. Timeless acceleration.
> > If all accelerations were the same we wouldn't need a principle.
> > It is only because they are not exactly the same that
> > we have a principle relating accelerating frames to
> > unmoving frames having weight in gravity.
> >
> > Mitch Raemsch
> > -- Time moves --
> >
>
> Mitch wrote:
> << There is no motion or change in motion in gravity's weight.
> So if there are no changes there can be no rate - to no change. >>
>
> Our inability to similarly associate a changing entity with the
> phenomena we know as gravity is hardly basis to say:
> "no change is occuring".

There is no movement for sitting still in gravity. Yet it is equivelent
to acceleration.
Nothing moving through space therefor no Rate of change. Thats my
point.
Take out the time rate and you have a timeless acceleration.
Mitch

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Electo London Gravity ?
    ... |> Alright Electro London gravity as a remainder of Electric field, ... |> Newton's are as a result of the acceleration of 1 kg which is itself ... |> otherwise you are carrying this 1 kg weight about with all your ... weight is irrelevant to the measurement of gravity. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Acceleration Without Time
    ... > The equivalence principle is about weight in gravity and weight ... > in non-gravitational acceleration. ... But it doesn't for weight in gravity. ... or that the clocks higher up are moving at speeds faster than clocks ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Take the time rate out of the Equivalence Principle.
    ... The EP is Einsteins version of acceleration described by ... object that has weight in gravity. ... It's sitting still in gravity that the equivalence principle describes. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: More evidence of negative curvature
    ... > When I first encountered relativity I saw what I thought of as ... > in gravity. ... > of the Equivalence Principle is in order. ... > states that gravity is equivalent to acceleration. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Acceleration With and Without Rate
    ... >> There is no motion or change in motion in gravity's weight. ... >> When you remove the rate from the Equivalence Principle you are ... >> with a more general definition of acceleration. ... >> The strength of gravity in weight is thus limited. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Loading