Re: Science/Physics Forums that SUCK

From: Brad Guth (ieisbradguth_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/12/05 

Date: 11 Mar 2005 16:47:13 -0800

Dear incest borg 'DrPostman',
Apparently it's not our NASA or even MAILGATE that sucks, as it's them
normal laws of physics that suck, and thereby all that's supposedly
hard-science can't but suck no matters what. Only those mainstream
conditional laws of physics need be applied whenever questioning
whatever's lord NASA certified, and otherwise everything becomes even
more skewed if it involves our resident warlord and the likes of those
extremely stealth WMD.

It looks as though I've become a little out of touch with other
realities, such as those of David Sereda. Sorry about that previous old
link that has become off-line. I just searched for 'david sereda' or
'david sereda video' and came up with the following;
http://www.alienresistance.org/aod04_david_sereda.htm
http://www.alienresistance.org/nasa_ufo_video.htm
http://groups.msn.com/NASAUFOS/photos1.msnw?Page=1
http://www.laufo.com/science-sereda.html
http://uplink.space.com/printthread.php?Cat=&Board=seti&main=42424&type=thread
http://www.videocollection.com/product.html?category_id=789&product_id=1061
and it seems the list goes on and on. Thus perhaps if you're into the
likes of whatever's incoming and/or passing nearby Earth that's defying
the laws of gravity, that of kinetic energy as well as emitting a
strong energy signature within the UV spectrum, in that case there's
yet another realm of modern day physics that apparently didn't exist
before now. At least NASA doesn't have a freaking official clue as to
anything other than their usual disinformation-R-us status quo of
snookering humanity.

Since my PC is still being so thoughtfully infected by best of the best
NSA/MI6 spooks, as well as experiencing loads of online delays while
others tap into and/or block whatever I'm doing, in fact there's so
much of their MS accommodated back-door mainstream status quo incest
sperm as DNA poison on my hard-drive, so much so that if I exported my
PC contents into the internet I believe that mine alone could bring
down the entire global network within hours, and/or it'll somehow
infect the world with a worse form of mad-cow.

In spite of their ongoing and orchestrated efforts at sucking the very
life out of humanity, I do have file backups and if need be I'll go
into a local library or University in order to continue my personal
quest of overthrowing this snookered world with the truth and nothing
but the truth, that is unless you've got a better idea.

Actually, for getting myself somewhat back on topic, it's looking as
though a lunar solar farm that's using a combination of sterling
solar/thermal energy conversion, mylar-mirrors incorporating PV
conversion cells, and of course direct thermal heat-exchange storage
and subsequent redistribution for whatever secondary process heating
should contribute at the very least 750 watts/m2, and there's obviously
no limits as to the coverage of which solar farms can occupy, as
there's not a tree-hugger in sight.

Certainly the near vacuum of the unterraformed moon and/or of otherwise
being nicely insulated by way of R-1024/m worth of basalt
micro-balloons or just via that magic clumping moon-dirt that's
selectively retro-reflective yet somehow non-reactive according to the
NASA/Apollo wizards like Jay Utah, in spite of all that's seemingly
going against our moon, it is going to yield a fair amount of lunar
surface area for obtaining solar energy that can be effectively stored
into massive gyros (especially by way of those absolutely massive
counter-rotating gyros situated interactively at nearly zero-G at ME-L1
zone that's along the tether that's securing the CM/ISS and of it's
tether dipole element that's streaming off towards Earth) and/or
otherwise into well insulated thermal-wells is certainly going to save
the day if you're planning upon staying the lunar night.

Of directly focused raw solar energy, as onto a process of
melting/boiling basalt should obtain nearly a full kw/m2. Thereby each
km X km robotic solar farm should contribute a MW of basalt pot melting
energy that's going to produce the most absolutely pure fibers that are
of the least amount contaminated with the likes of nasty O2 and N2,
thus the final GPa results should become impressive to say the least. I
suppose the very same can be said of processing silica, of which raw
silica should also coexist somewhere upon the moon.

Onward to the other somewhat important topic of 'Life on Venus'
As certified as a village idiot that I supposedly am, it seems that I
do recall in high school being informed as to how hot and nasty Venus
was, thus never a word as to any possible form of life to being had.
However, it seems I don't recall being informed that the laws of
physics do not apply to the likes of Venus, nor that only conditional
laws of physics apply to our moon.

Apparently there's been new and improved laws of physics that actually
involves energy-in being equal to energy-out, and that of the laws of
thermal dynamics wherever there's a compression of a given gas always
involves a transition of energy being converted into heat (at least up
until the point of said gas becoming a sufficient solid), or vise
versa, and of subsequently removing that pressure from a given volume
of compressed gas accomplishes the exact opposit, and I suppose that's
still why refrigeration works as well as air conditioning via any form
of gas that's compressible, heat-exchangeable and thus available for
extracting heat so that the pesky physics rule of energy-in =
energy-out.

I believe such a compressible gas can be that of freon, common air,
hydrogen and lo and behold CO2 seems to have represented another
perfectly sound element (in fact better than most freons) for that of
energy storage and thereby on-demand heat transfer. Oddly, in high
school we were never informed of such things, so perhaps the laws of
thermaldynamics simply didn't exist way back then, as that would make
perfect sense as to why we weren't being informed of what's possible
whenever you have an unlimited resource of energy and absolute loads of
CO2.

Speaking about available energy;
Mars absolutely sucks, Earth is some what so-so, our moon is absolutely
clumping-pay-dirt overloaded with energy and, it seems the likes of
Venus is entirely off the freaking scale.

Or perhaps this too is yet another one of those new law of physics,
that of kinetics as to what any moving volume of gas and that of what
must transpire as that volume and mass equalizes it's way through a
radial power turbine, or through just about any other form of turbine,
piston of rotor having a physical differential of displacement. As lo
and behold, on Venus there's 65+kg/m3 that's everywhere you'd care to
look, and hot-damn if there's not 4+bar/km and otherwise 10°K/km just
off the deck, whereas a 10 km differential represents nearly 40 bar and
100°K (especially potent if we're starting off somewhat below the
average or somewhat sealevel elevation, or otherwise well into their
nifty season of nighttime where instead of 92 bar we've got better than
97 bar to start off with).

Thus the real honest to God question with regard to Venus hasn't
actually been about where said energy shall come from, but as to how
many mega, giga or tera watts would you like?

So, what I'd be interested to know is where can I locate the sorts of
minion talents and resources in order to expand research upon the
possibilities of how some other forms of life (including whatever
imported ETs) could have been managing quite nicely right under our
pathetically dumbfounded noses?

Basic township that's situated upon Venus:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
Basic LSE (Lunar Space Elevator)
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Regards, Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS topics:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm

Relevant Pages

  • Re: MAILGATE sucks, or at least NSA/MI6 sucks
    ... Apparently it's not MAILGATE that sucks, as it's the normal laws of ... physics need be applied whenever questioning whatever's lord NASA ... strong energy signature within the UV spectrum, ... Onward to the other somewhat important topic of 'Life on Venus' ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Science/Physics Forums that SUCK
    ... normal laws of physics that suck, ... strong energy signature within the UV spectrum, ... Onward to the other somewhat important topic of 'Life on Venus' ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Can energy conservation be derived from Newtons motion laws
    ... >>force satisfies conservation of energy given Newton's laws. ... > axiom of physics. ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • Re: Can energy conservation be derived from Newtons motion laws
    ... > force satisfies conservation of energy given Newton's laws. ... Similarly in physics there is no master ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • Re: Moon Hoax people
    ... > What happened to hard-science and those regular laws of physics? ... The hard science was too hard for Brad, ... > physics on behalf of Venus, I'd be calling Venus my home world, or at ...
    (sci.space.history)