Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?
From: Timo Nieminen (uqtniemi_at_mailbox.uq.edu.au)
Date: 03/12/05
- Next message: Uncle Al: "Re: cheap clean electricity"
- Previous message: Timo Nieminen: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- In reply to: bz: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Next in thread: bz: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Reply: bz: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 11:31:12 +1000
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, bz wrote:
> And then there is circular polarization.
>
> Cross polarization (h at one end of the communications circuit, v at the
> other) results in many dB loss in signal strength.
and circular polarisation is a good fix for such alignment problems.
-- Timo
- Next message: Uncle Al: "Re: cheap clean electricity"
- Previous message: Timo Nieminen: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- In reply to: bz: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Next in thread: bz: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Reply: bz: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]