Re: List of Cranks here

From: David Thomson (news5_at_volantis.org)
Date: 03/12/05 

Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 21:28:26 -0600

I have Feynman's Lectures as part of my personal library. I can't speak for
the others, but I have a solid foundation for my physics and it has been
getting some very good attention by scientists lately.

I disagree that the Standard Model will be a subset of anything in the
future. It will be mothballed as a better system of physics arises to take
its place.

Dave

"phoenix" <photonixx@go.com> wrote in message
news:1110154957.425057.212520@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Can we have a complete list of cranks here.
>
> 1. Fusioneer
> 2. Greysky
> 3. newedena
> 4. Y.Porat
> 5. Thomson
> 6. Ken Seto
> 7. TomGee
> 8. Smart Model
> 9. Retic
> 10. John Sefton
> 11. Freddifix (?)
> 12. (who else)
>
>
> Ok. Cranks. How many of you have read this book
> "Feynman Lectures on Physics 3 Vol set"??
>
> You guys keep committing very basic mistakes that
> Heymann kept on correcting. It's very frustrating.
> How can you take apart the Standard Model if you
> are not veteran in it?? We know the Standard Model
> is not complete and something can turn it into a subset.
> But to enhance it, we must be adept in the in and
> out of Standard Model so as to be able to change
> it successfully.
>
> So, I recommened cranks to read up some basic textbooks
> such as Feynman's and be familiar with all the concepts
> before spewing horse manure as Heymann love to call it.
> It's getting frustrating to waste time reading rubbish
> every morning.
>
> Phoenix
> (Anti-Crank
> Pro Enhanced Physics)
>

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Purpose of theoretical physics - Was "Whats wrong with loop
    ... Do you want chemistry from the Standard Model? ... these approximations have been found before the more complete theory was ... Let me be more specific about the atoms and chemistry. ... This brings us into nuclear physics. ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • Re: the basis of relativity
    ... If one can develop a theory which isn't gauge ... >>>correct in that we needn't do physics. ... I assert that the standard model and various ... >which we may directly observe hadrons and leptons. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Quantum Mechanics according to Mark Mccutcheon
    ... If that can make you derive the physics of qi. ... trying to avoid so I cycle from fighting standard model ... >> purpose of regaining the Aether Derived Energy for the day. ... >> the wave function. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Science and dishonesty
    ... >standard model, and many people think there is none. ... ``axiomatic field theory'' refers to field theory based on ... the wightman axioms, although any failure of quantum field theory to ... provide a clue to some new physics that has been otherwise rather elusive. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits
    ... based on the Standard Model interpretation of these processes, ... quantifying the stable particles. ... So far I can quantify the ... The physics model I'm producing is an ordered and logical approach to ...
    (sci.physics)