Re: transforming energy infinite
From: CWatters (colin.watters_at_pandoraBOX.be)
Date: 03/14/05
- Next message: CWatters: "Re: transforming energy infinite"
- Previous message: Harry: "Re: Conceptualizing the Relativity of Clock Time with Moving Rulers"
- In reply to: ring_theory: "Re: transforming energy infinite"
- Next in thread: CWatters: "Re: transforming energy infinite"
- Reply: CWatters: "Re: transforming energy infinite"
- Reply: ring_theory: "Re: transforming energy infinite"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 08:35:48 GMT
"ring_theory" <ring_theory@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Vj6Zd.126962$4q6.10698@attbi_s01...
> Common motors and inductance coils rely on a too close interaction of the
> magnetic field where the fields penetrate the magnetic mass causing eddys
as
> the magnetic fields try to reach an equilibrium.
But they do that to maximise efficiency. You want the strongest field you
can get so that you can reduce the number of turns in the windings - the
more turns you need the greater the resistance. One way to do that is to
reduce the air gap and "focus" the field using iron pole pieces. How do you
eliminate the resistive losses in the copper windings in your design?
Supercondutors :-?
> The back emf issue is caused by simply having another coil or field too
> close to the back side of the coil as in standard armatures. the ring's
> radius allows plenty of room for spacing of coils and no other coil drive
or
> induction will have even the slightest chance of interferring with
> eachothers fields.
That suggests you don't understand how back emf is created. It's _not_ an
"interferrence between two fields" so seperating the coils would have no
effect. Back emf is created within the drive coil itself - how can you
seperate something from itself?
- Next message: CWatters: "Re: transforming energy infinite"
- Previous message: Harry: "Re: Conceptualizing the Relativity of Clock Time with Moving Rulers"
- In reply to: ring_theory: "Re: transforming energy infinite"
- Next in thread: CWatters: "Re: transforming energy infinite"
- Reply: CWatters: "Re: transforming energy infinite"
- Reply: ring_theory: "Re: transforming energy infinite"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|