Re: Physics Cultists
mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu
Date: 03/14/05
- Next message: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: origin of inertia"
- Previous message: PD: "Re: Space-time was Created Expanding from a Point"
- In reply to: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Physics Cultists"
- Next in thread: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Physics Cultists"
- Reply: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Physics Cultists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 23:02:29 GMT
In article <d14cqi$a28$2@rainier.uits.indiana.edu>, glhansen@steel.ucs.indiana.edu (Gregory L. Hansen) writes:
>In article <C0aZd.4$45.1423@news.uchicago.edu>,
> <mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu> wrote:
>>In article <lf9Zd.66355$r55.4284@attbi_s52>, Sam Wormley
>><swormley1@mchsi.com> writes:
>>>Jack Martinelli wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Now, here's the thing. People believe in God. Lots of people believe in
>>>> lots of Gods. In fact most people believe in some form of super-being(s).
>>>> Nature has not gotten rid of the human tendency to believe. Therefore
>>>> belief must be useful & religion must be useful. Believing in yourself is
>>>> pretty useful. So is believing in others. Right?
>>>
>>> We only have evidence of historical evidence of religion for possibly
>>> 4-5 thousand years... not very long on the evolutionary time scale.
>>
>>Just to nitpick a bit, we only have historical evidence of anything
>>for 4-5 thousand years. The reason the time earlier than this is
>>called "pre-history" is that we have no clear historical evidence
>>about anything there. So, in this case, an absence of evidence is
>>clearly not an evidence of absence.
>
>But there's some scanty and interpretable evidence from paleontology--
>Venus figurines, neadertal burial rituals...
>
Yes, certainly.
>>
>>> Humans may cause their own extinction in the next few hundred years--
>>> religion being one factor.
>>
>>Hardly. Humans tend to power struggles, regardless of whether
>>religion is or isn't involved. None of the great conflicts of the
>>20th century (or, for that matter, of any of the European conflicts
>>past the 30 years war) had much to do with religion. Don't confuse
>>correlation with causation.
>
>Some people come up with creative uses of the word religion. The various
>Communist purges with communism identified as a religion, our own physics
>cult with physics identified as a religion, etc.
Yes, of course:-) Though, I would say that communism (as implemented)
did share lots of similarities with religions. Same goes for various
other ideologies.
> I've been imbibing of
>the holy waters of the Coca Cola Company and soon I'll have to purge
>myself at the sacred porcelain of Crane Plumbing.
>
Oh, you've Crane too:-)
>To paraphrase Freud, sometimes an egomaniacal grab for power is just an
>egomaniacal grab for power.
>
Yep. Ghengis Khan and Tamerlane felt no need to invoke "God's will".
Same for Alexander and Napoleon (and countless others). Mind you,
people do have some desire to, at the same time, lord it over others
while feeling that they're doing the "right thing". But if one excuse
isn't available, another can always be found.
Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool,
meron@cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"
- Next message: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: origin of inertia"
- Previous message: PD: "Re: Space-time was Created Expanding from a Point"
- In reply to: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Physics Cultists"
- Next in thread: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Physics Cultists"
- Reply: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Physics Cultists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|