Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: robert j. kolker (nowhere_at_nowhere.net)
Date: 03/15/05
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Brad Guth: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- In reply to: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:47:50 -0500
Lester Zick wrote:
> And the mind and mental effects are non material factors unless you
> propose to show an equal-and-opposite-ideas rule for the mind.So what?
What does equal and opposite mean when those words refer to ideas. Are
you talking about one idea being the logical negation of the other? In
that case the ideas are not equal. Are you talking about a pair of
vectors of equal magnitude but pointing in opposite directions? What the
hell are you talking about?
Bob Kolker
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Brad Guth: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- In reply to: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|