Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: aeo6 (aeo6_at_cornell.edu)
Date: 03/15/05
- Next message: PD: "Re: My definition of force!!!"
- Previous message: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 13:28:06 -0500
robert j. kolker said:
>
>
> Lester Zick wrote:
>
> >
> > Of course the world is full of circles, Tony, and other curved shapes.
> > Straight lines only exist in our minds. It's the reason we have only a
> > limited ability to comprehend nature. The problem is that in our minds
> > is where numbers lie so they don't lie on any curved line we actually
> > know mentally.
>
> How about the parabola given by y = x^2. The real number x can be
> associated with the point on the parabola (x, x^2). So the real numbers
> can be thought of as lying on the above parabola which is surely not a
> straight line. The parabola given above is just as much the real number
> line as the x axis of the cartesion plane.
>
> You are pathetic.
Oy again with the insults!
>
> Bob Kolker
>
Yes, one could construct a parabolic coordinate system, just as one can create
a radial coordinate system. It can even be 2D. I doubt this reflects the state
of space, however. Circles make more sense, especially given the fact that
infinity=-infinity. (baits the hook)
-- Smiles, Tony
- Next message: PD: "Re: My definition of force!!!"
- Previous message: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|