Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: aeo6 (aeo6_at_cornell.edu)
Date: 03/15/05
- Next message: Maleki: "As long as you're predictable... ? :-)"
- Previous message: PD: "Re: My definition of force!!!"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 13:29:18 -0500
robert j. kolker said:
>
>
> Lester Zick wrote:
> > And the mind and mental effects are non material factors unless you
> > propose to show an equal-and-opposite-ideas rule for the mind.So what?
>
> What does equal and opposite mean when those words refer to ideas. Are
> you talking about one idea being the logical negation of the other? In
> that case the ideas are not equal. Are you talking about a pair of
> vectors of equal magnitude but pointing in opposite directions? What the
> hell are you talking about?
>
> Bob Kolker
>
>
Duh! Tautological regression to self-contradictory alternatives, doofus!
Everybody knows that!
-- Smiles, Tony
- Next message: Maleki: "As long as you're predictable... ? :-)"
- Previous message: PD: "Re: My definition of force!!!"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|