Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Lester Zick (lesterDELzick_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 03/15/05
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:42:49 GMT
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 13:29:18 -0500, Tony Orlow (aeo6)
<aeo6@cornell.edu> in comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
>robert j. kolker said:
>>
>>
>> Lester Zick wrote:
>> > And the mind and mental effects are non material factors unless you
>> > propose to show an equal-and-opposite-ideas rule for the mind.So what?
>>
>> What does equal and opposite mean when those words refer to ideas. Are
>> you talking about one idea being the logical negation of the other? In
>> that case the ideas are not equal. Are you talking about a pair of
>> vectors of equal magnitude but pointing in opposite directions? What the
>> hell are you talking about?
>>
>> Bob Kolker
>>
>>
>Duh! Tautological regression to self-contradictory alternatives, doofus!
>Everybody knows that!
Don't forget the "finite" Tony. Lest we be accused of undefined
infinite countation.
Regards - Lester
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|