Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!
From: Ian St. John (istjohn_at_noemail.usa)
Date: 03/17/05
- Next message: Vendicar Decarian: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Previous message: Vendicar Decarian: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- In reply to: Rand Simberg: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Next in thread: Vendicar Decarian: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 22:14:32 -0500
Rand Simberg wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:00:12 -0500, in a place far, far away, "Ian St.
> John" <istjohn@noemail.usa> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in
> such a way as to indicate that:
>
>>>>>> And agains, the issue is not your 'precise terminiology' about
>>>>>> just how little the U.S. admits but the FACTS that no WMDs were
>>>>>> found in Iraq.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://slate.msn.com/id/2114820/
>>>>
>>>> Wow. The 'official report' which found no evidence of the machinery
>>>> must have gotten it wrong and been scooped by Slate. Is that what
>>>> you are saying?
>>>
>>> No.
>>>
>>> It might help if you'd learn to read, though.
>>
>> Long ago. Do you want to argue semantics? The story seems to be a
>> claim that their were WMD faciliteis that were offloaded and sold
>> elsewhere before the war
>
> And after.
>
> "According to the supporting story, Dr. Sami al-Araji, the deputy
> minister of industry, says that *after the fall of Baghdad* in April
> 2003, "'looters systematically dismantled and removed tons of
> machinery from Saddam Hussein's most important weapons installations,
> including some with high-precision equipment capable of making parts
> for nuclear arms.'"
'Supporting bull***'? Your failure to use your brain to estimate the
chances of such a military operation operating unimpeeded and crossing
borders out of Iraq while under U.S. control and surviellance from air and
ground, just illustrates how dim you are.
>
> As I said, you weren't reading. Is English not your first language?
I was reading. But I was taking the bull*** a bit less seriously than you,
apparently.
>
> Are you capable of embarrassment?
Yes. I can see that you wish some 'support' in your time of need?
>
> I wonder what's in the Bekaa Valley that the Syrians want to protect
> with their troops?
The Bekaa Valley perhaps? Stronghold of their allies?
>
> Just an idle thought...
Most of your thoughts are so idle as to be without any power. You really
should try putting some effort behind your crap.
- Next message: Vendicar Decarian: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Previous message: Vendicar Decarian: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- In reply to: Rand Simberg: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Next in thread: Vendicar Decarian: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]