Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: aeo6 (aeo6_at_cornell.edu)
Date: 03/17/05
- Next message: gianluca: "re:A PEDESTRIAN IS HIT BY A CAR ... PROBLEM..."
- Previous message: stephen_at_nomail.com: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:32:25 -0500
robert j. kolker said:
>
>
> Lester Zick wrote:
> >
> > Pick a fact, Bob, any fact, and tell us what makes it necessarily a
> > true fact.
>
> You used the term root function. I am asking what that means. It is a
> fair question.
>
> Bob Kolker
>
>
I used the term root function in terms of an integral. I thought it was obvious
that I was referring to the function on which one is calculating the integral.
But nothing is obvious to you, Bob, except concrete blocks.
-- Smiles, Tony
- Next message: gianluca: "re:A PEDESTRIAN IS HIT BY A CAR ... PROBLEM..."
- Previous message: stephen_at_nomail.com: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|