Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Daryl McCullough (stevendaryl3016_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/17/05
- Next message: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 17 Mar 2005 11:59:10 -0800
Tony says...
>
>Daryl McCullough said:
>> Who said anything about a number system? I am talking about orderings
>> of the natural number system. Sometimes, we write 3 before 1; for example,
>> when we are writing out the decimal expansion of pi. That doesn't mean
>> that 3 has lost its meaning.
>
>That is entirely unrelated to the reordering of the number system that I was
>cautioning against.
Nobody talked about reordering the number system. You are confused.
-- Daryl McCullough Ithaca, NY
- Next message: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
