Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Albert Wagner (albertwagner_at_cox.net)
Date: 03/18/05
- Next message: tadchem: "Re: God is not happy"
- Previous message: Neil - Salem, MA USA: "Re: Relativity question"
- In reply to: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:09:59 -0600
Tony Orlow (aeo6) wrote:
<snip>
I believe that there is more than enough blame to go all around.
Like revenge cycles in primitive groups, all it takes is one
insult to trigger an ever growing spiral.
-- "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based on the field concept, i. e., on continuous structures. In that case nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics." -- Albert Einstein in a 1954 letter to Michele Besso.
- Next message: tadchem: "Re: God is not happy"
- Previous message: Neil - Salem, MA USA: "Re: Relativity question"
- In reply to: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|