Einstein was Precisely Backward, Deliberately

From: Robert Grace (rgrace_at_aemail4u-dot-com.no-spam.invalid)
Date: 03/18/05 

Date: 18 Mar 2005 13:40:00 -0600

http://www.rgrace.org/159/168contacts.html

Einstein was precisely backward, deliberately

I challenge any straight A college student, any college graduate of
any discipline, any mainline scientist, any independent researcher,
any historian who knows exactly what Einstein said or anyone who
thinks you are a spokesman/spokeswoman for Einstein's precision, to,
not prove a negative, as in producing evidence that the below
premises are incorrect, but to simply answer the 8 questions that
leads to Einstein, or his followers, deliberately and erroneously
assigning the below concepts to wrong sources: 186,283 mps to light,
Space dragging to mass, Space twisting to mass, Geodetic precession
to mass, Time to 4D and Gravity caused by mass or Gravity, a
derivative of the electron, instead of correctly attributing all
these to the true, superior, first cause and source called space.

After all, Al, himself cautioned, with inappropriate self-interest to
the others, In his stand against the ether, Einstein argued, "we
should not speak of things that can't be measured." This mantra was
taken up by all others who realized that if it could not be measured,
there was really no need for any measurers. (R. Grace, file
147supraphase.html)

If most researchers first deduce from the known, such as, molecule,
atom, electron, proton and neutron, to the unknown such as quark,
gluon, graviton and the origin and source, space itself, then
researchers are working from the controlled forces to the controlling
forces...this is backwards and should be reversed:

The 8 questions are:

Is unknown, space, superior in every way, to the known? Yes or no.
Quote Einstein's exact words on this.

If space is superior, with quanta as a packet of space and charge as
phase precession of the smallest vortexes of space, then why was
quanta and charge misassigned to lesser forces while ignoring space?
Quote Einstein's exact words on this.

If space is not superior, then what is Einstein's superior source of
light, gravity and mass? Quote Einstein's exact words on this.

Light velocity of 186,283 mps was proven to be the velocity of space
in 1990 (Majka). Why do Einstein's followers teach it was light
velocity instead? Quote Einstein's exact words on this.

Gravity is what spiraling space does. Two simple spirals of space
either spin the same way or different, creating more space between or
removing space between them. Why do Einstein's followers teach that
gravity attraction occurs between masses and mass is somehow causing
this attraction? Quote Einstein's exact words on this.

Time is a human invention. In this frequency universe, what we call
interval, is vastly different between the fastest sub-atomic time to
the slowest astronomic body time, the whole spectrum of which, will
require a Trinary Relativity of 3 completely different maths, not
including the 3 invisible partner maths to the first, visible 3. Why
do Einstein's followers; rigorous science, even today, "assume
without examination, the unidirectional, one-valued, one-dimensional
(4thD) character of the time continuum." Quote Einstein's exact words
on this.

Light bending is said to be caused by strong gravity near mass. If
gravity is not understood by Einstein's followers, if unknown gravity
is said to bend light, which light doesn't exist in space for you will
never see a flashlight work in space nor is there matter in deep space
from which matter, only, does light radiate and if gravity is what
space does, if space bends itself into tighter and tighter spirals
causing its own distortion, then why do Einstein's followers teach
that gravity bends light near mass or that mass bends space when
space is superior? Quote Einstein's exact words on this.

Gravity Probe B will conclude that mass twists, drags and precesses
space instead of the reality of space twisting, dragging and
precessing mass. Why was Einstein's theories and his followers
"precisely backward" concerning so many concepts? Quote Einstein's
exact words on this.
Try to be plain and straightforward. No razzle-dazzle. Remember, if
you cant explain it to a child, we will assume you probably don't
know what you are talkin about or you are being deceptive. All email
responses will be posted including all foul language and email names
and addresses. Any email without a valid name and address will be
thrown out.

Premises:

186,283 mps was attributed to light instead of to non-dimension space,

Space dragging was attributed to mass instead of to non-dimension
space,

Space twisting was attributed to mass instead of to non-dimension
space,

Geodetic precession was attributed to mass instead of to non-dimension
space,

Gravity was attributed to mass instead of to non-dimension space,

Time was attributed to 4D instead of to 0D gravity,

Light bending was attributed to gravity instead of to optical,
non-dimension space,

All because non-dimension space could not easily be measured,
therefore the measurers were not needed.
05/19/04 Robert Grace

Robert Grace
rgrace@aemail4u.com

 Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
                http://www.usenet.com

Relevant Pages

  • Re: "Einsteins Unfortunate Legacy #2"
    ... revealed to be a force resulting from the release of mass energy due to ... However, as to the assertion re gravity quoted above, I would like to ... work titled "The Quantum as a Physical Entity". ... the energy of expansion and contraction ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: What is gravity, I have no clue
    ... so all things warp, and warping is what gravity is, warping around ... mass in the fabric ... energy, and the formula does not work. ... Why is it that spiral galaxies have a lot of dark matter and elliptic ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: How do we know antimatter has POSITIVE mass?
    ... | QFT both suggest that like matter, antimatter has positive energy. ... acceleration due to a gravity of a negative ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Einstain was Precisely Backward, Deliberately
    ... > My Quote: The point is, you still fail to comprehend that chirality ... Cant even tell me what gravity is. ... > of behavior of from flat-space motion due to the presence of mass. ... Einstain taught you backward. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: a few simple questions (from a layman)
    ... "The simplest way to state the equivalence principle is ... inertial mass and gravitational mass are the same thing. ... "gravitational mass is the charge to which gravity ... > which states that Earth doesn't have a special place in the universe. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)