Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs

Dear 'tj Frazir',
These incest cloned borgs are doing exactly what they do best, they
side-track whomever they can't sink or assimilate into their
collective. In other words, these folks seriously suck.

It's interesting, as you must be satellite connected to this GOOGLE
forum that otherwise sucks via land-line that's polluted with their
spermware. Once again, I remain impressed. I'll repeat what I'd just
posted, and although it's still somewhat off-topic from the moon it's
certainly a good enough ticket to ride if it'll get us the necessary
resources to flush these fools once and for all into their own spendy
space-toilet and disinformation-R-us cesspool that they can't seem to
get enough of.

As regarding your sliding VANE method is what I'd call in hydraulic
terms a rotary vane motor, as being exactly what I'd expected. It's not
even a new invention but, it's an absolute win-win as for providing by
far the most energy from a given head pressure, and remains as the most
volume efficient method of converting such into a rotational torque
that's capable of generating alternating current, as in mega joules/s.

1100 foot drop and 500 psi isn't what's provided by your everyday
stream. However, it isn't all that difficult to come by. Most folks can
create such a vertical head with a suitable pipe, if need be out of
hardwoods with lots of metal stays or by entirely that of reinforced
portland cement, although an iron or alloy steel pipe is best, and even
better yet if that were encased in solid reinforced concrete. With the
requirement of less m3/s represents less erosion, thus your rotary vane
method offer yet another win-win for hydroelectric.

Off the top I'd give your vane method a 99% volumetric efficiency, and
a high temperature superconducting(HTS) generator should become worth
98%, thus 97% overall.

BTW; if these HTS were applied on behalf of our 36 MW main propulsion
motors for our LH2 supertankers, I don't believe we'd have any shortage
of cooling whatever down to something below 25°K, and if that's not
capable of superconducting, I don't know what is.

I believe the GE LM6000 is worth 160 MW in simple cycle efficiency, in
which case we might consider charging really big bucks for towing a
thousand or so water-sporting folks at 50+knots behind our
supertankers. Even the LM2500+ isn't exactly lacking in capacity,
especially in combined 51% cycle efficiency of delivering 46 MW. In
this case the bigger the gas turbine the better, however having a
rather nifty supply of boil-off H2 should put another new spin into the
interpretation of cycle efficiency, whereas we might get the SFC down
to something rather interesting, especially if were feeding the likes
of H2O2 into that gas turbine.

"tj Frazir; The sliding vane beats the turbine 500 to 1.

As much as I like to exaggerate, even I wouldn't go quite that far,
whereas a 5:1 improvement would represent 500% which should more than
knock every other sock off for as far as the eye could see, at least
I'd be seriously impressed at a mere 2:1 improvement. However, at
somewhat less hydrostatic head pressure and with far less volume of
whatever available flow is where your sliding vane should seriously
outperform the conventional power turbine, although a well engineered
radial turbine is actually quite efficient by way of diverting the flow
90°. However, I do like your exaggerating style of delivery, so much
so that perhaps we share some of the same DNA.

If I might suggest taking up your offer of marketing and perhaps
overseeing on behalf of the applications of such sliding vane
hydroelectric installations, such as the 35 MW class of installation
seems like a perfectly good amount of energy that most any community
could put to good use. However, I'd bet the volume market is actually
of what's below the 10 MW class, as for the really big stuff they don't
seem to care about the overall efficiency. An efficient and reliable 10
MW source of hydroelectric energy would apply to more than 90% of the
world markets that don't have the warm and fuzzy likes of ENRON
sticking it between their ***-cheaks.

BTW; what did you honestly think about that LH2 super tanker notion;
ships of 1000 meters by 50 meters (a floating pipeline of LH2), perhaps
60~72 MW for propulsion and some of that energy as being derived from
the boil-off of the LH2, thus a smaller amount of fuel oil needs to be
consumed, even less if that bulk cargo was in the form of 98+% H2O2.
I'm thinking a fleet of perhaps 10 of these fire breathing LH2
supertankers and lo and behold, whatever's left of the terrestrial
energy market is ours to pillage and profit from (just like GW Bush and
his Cheney ENRON friends have been doing to us right now). With that
accomplished, we're off to the moon or wherever our combined wealth can
take us.

Of course, each LH2 super tanker would require at least one certified
mad scientist as crew, as it might be otherwise be misconstrued by a
certain resident warlord as amounting to an actual WMD, or at the very
least seriously bad PR if one of our LH2 supertankers somehow managed
to incinerate the other half of NYC. I have good confidence that
between us we might manage to avoid such an outcome, although of all
the high-density energy products upon this planet, H2 or even LH2 is by
far the safest and least impacting upon the environment next to
hydroelectric and of course solar/sterling. Of course, you could
seriously drown by something related to hydroelectric, and otherwise
obtain a serious sun-burn or just become blinded for life from
whatever's solar/sterling, whereas anytime you concentrate energy along
with the likes of village idiot morons there's no such thing as 100%
safe energy, and that's exactly why we'd be paid the really big bucks
for transporting that stuff.

-

This closing rant is contributed for the ongoing benefit of others (The
New York Times, The Washington Post and any other news media plus
whatever general topic newcomers), and not that any of this topic
matters to those without a stitch of remorse outside of whatever
appeases their MI6/NSA pagan NASA/Apollo cold-war or bust God(s), as in
spite of their spermware of flak having the intent as to kill-off my PC
if not myself, within my spare dyslexic time I've slightly polished on
my external 'gv-topics.htm' page, and I'm remaining intent upon working
on other pages as soon to be improved. As I learn more that can be
independently supported by the regular laws of physics, by sufficient
hard-science and subjectively honest interpretations of whatever I have
been given to work with, as best I'll share that knowledge, which will
likely include revisions and retractions upon any number of what I've
offered thus far. Unfortunately, since I'm unfunded and on the usual
'need-to-know' bases with regard to anything that might rock a
mainstream boat, and that my PC is being continually attacked with
NSA/MI6 spermware, it seems this process is going to take many
thousands of my lose cannon shots before the truth and nothing but the
truth is ever going be told. And I bet you thought the likes of big and
fully loaded aircraft smashing into fully occupied tall buildings was
as bad as it gets; think again.

Basic township that's situated upon Venus:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
Basic LSE (Lunar Space Elevator):
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Other available topics by; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm

.

Quantcast