Re: The Future of Physics and the World

<whopkins@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1112661908.241399.303180@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| I hope you find something. But then you're going to face the real
| mystery: just what did you find?
|
| I think you're seriously *under*estimating the significance of what
| you're looking for. Given the equivalence I outlined between the
| different geometrical formulations of gravity theory (teleparallel =
GR
| + matter fields), you're not actually testing between theories of
| gravity. Both should provide sufficient infrastructure to support the
| finds.
|
| No. What you're actually testing is the Standard Model, itself. A
| chiral anomaly -- unless explained away by the Weak force -- is a 5th
| force. It's actually the Standard Model which this won't fit into.
| You won't merely be nudging gravitational physics ... which will
remain
| intact ... but pushing over a foundation of particle physics.
|
| Uncle Al wrote:
| > Please do not solve any of the world's major problems
| > before Uncle Al can overthrow all of physics.
|
| Gandhi worries about fixing the world. Alexander simply cuts the knot
| and imposes direction and order on it. Hence, all the history books
| make a clean divide between the pre 332BC era and post 332BC.
|
| New worlds need new physics.
|
| The outline I gave in the article of the reconciliation of GR with QFT
| by a strategy to handle QFT on globally non-hyperbolic spacetimes is
| something entirely new.
|
| If this fits, with Jacobson's result (the derivability of GR in the
| classical limit from the Hawking formula, *alone*, applied to local
| Rindler horizons) emerging as a consequence of the requirement to
| ensure consistency between overlapping locally hyperbolic regions,
then
| you're getting QG through the back door!
|
| The major issue has always been how to extend QFT to achronal
| spacetimes, because you want to be handle ALL types of classical
| backgrounds (not just the globally hyperbolic ones) before even
| starting to address the issue of how the background is quantized.
| Here, the quantization is simply skipped because the gravitational
| lensing effect Jacobson derived (Jacobson got Einstein's equations
| through gravitational lensing as a consequence of a compatibility
| constraint that comes out of making the Hawking formula work on
| overlapping parts of local Rindler horizons).
|
| The novelty is the way I'm applying the result. He was still working
| in chronal spacetimes with a global t parameter. I divested the need
| for the global t, replacing it by local homotopies. But the cost is
| that the pure quantum vacuum has to be given up -- the vacuum is
| necessarily a thermal state and no global pure state can exist. This,
| in fact, is something that ties closely to the research by Friedmann
| (my former thesis advisor), Thorne, Morris, Wald, et. al., showing the
| fundamental problems with making quantum fields fit consistently in
the
| presence of closed time-like loops or other causal anomalies. It can
| be done, but only up to a point. The obstacle is, in effect, the
| insistence on retaining a pure state for the vacuum.

You got that right. Take "vacuum" polarization up to tree level.
Space-time charge of +,- sqrt(hbar*c) rules then. This in turn requires
the concept of dual space-time. Dirac almost had it right with his Sea.
Flip it to be all positive with only certain energy states allowed for
fermions and fill them. Then toss it in another space-time that is dual
to ours and connected. One is left-handed and the other right-handed
and they ain't equal. This modified Dirac Sea is bounded from below.
Zero is really zero. Our zero is not really zero.

| Going over to a thermal state, the thermal noise of the underlying
heat
| bath is enough to cancel out the time-traveller inconsistencies that
| result in achronal spacetimes.

Yeah, it is all that negative energy crap that has to go.

FrediFizzx

http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.pdf
or postscript
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.ps

.

Relevant Pages

  • Never have so many been so wrong about so much!
    ... Peacock's theorem neglects vacuum coherence entirely and leads to the ... constraints of Einstein's gravity theory completely. ... Laplacian of Gravity Potential Energy Per Unit Test Particle Mass = ... Part A Special Relativity requires w = -1 for ALL zero point quantum ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Never have so many been so wrong about so much!
    ... Peacock's theorem neglects vacuum coherence entirely and leads to the ... constraints of Einstein's gravity theory completely. ... Laplacian of Gravity Potential Energy Per Unit Test Particle Mass = ... Part A Special Relativity requires w = -1 for ALL zero point quantum ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Never have so many been so wrong about so much!
    ... Peacock's theorem neglects vacuum coherence entirely and leads to the ... constraints of Einstein's gravity theory completely. ... Laplacian of Gravity Potential Energy Per Unit Test Particle Mass = ... Part A Special Relativity requires w = -1 for ALL zero point quantum ...
    (sci.math)
  • Sarfatti in Dublin GR 17
    ... vacuum zero point energy for metric engineering practical warp drive ... Where the exotic vacuum zero point energy density is ... induced gravity dependent on partial vacuum coherence. ... Measurements made on clusters of electrons operating as Exotic Vacuum ...
    (sci.math)
  • Sarfatti in Dublin GR 17
    ... vacuum zero point energy for metric engineering practical warp drive ... Where the exotic vacuum zero point energy density is ... induced gravity dependent on partial vacuum coherence. ... Measurements made on clusters of electrons operating as Exotic Vacuum ...
    (sci.physics)