Re: Dualism of Spacetime


John C. Polasek wrote:
> On 15 Apr 2005 03:36:58 -0700, "Jack" <chemphysicsdude@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >FrediFizzx wrote:
> >> "Jack" <chemphysicsdude@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> news:1113519287.117928.27830@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> |
> >> | http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/V12NO1PDF/V12N1YER.pdf
> >> |
> >> |
> >> | Freddifix, John Polasek, look at the above.. similar idea to
> >> | yours.
> >> |
> >> | Do you know the names of other researchers exploring the same
> >> | theory. I wanna compare them.
> >>
> >> Hey Jack, thanks for the link. Hmm... That is an interesting
paper.
> >> Has some microscopic details I was looking for. I am not sure
about
> >his
> >> "primitive" entities in the concept that 9 makes an electron. I
> >suspect
> >> it only takes one "primitive" entity to make the "main part" of
any
> >> fermion but it definitely depends on the sea fermion pairs to make
it
> >> the fermion that it is. In our "Spin Matrix" concept, an electron
> >looks
> >> like it is surrounded by a multitude of primitive entities. But
> >there
> >> may be some key ideas here to the particular geometry scheme we
need
> >for
> >> the quantum "vacuum".
> >>
> >> Did you get a link to Jay Yablon's ideas yet? Of course the
original
> >> dual space-time concept is from the master himself, Dirac. But
that
> >> *negative* energy sea un-bounded from below just can't work right.
I
> >> don't think the Universe is all that infinite when a small chunk
of
> >it
> >> is taken into consideration.
> >>
> >> FrediFizzx
> >>
> >> http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.pdf
> >> or postscript
> >> http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.ps
> >
> >
> >Of course, the master himself, Dirac, is the originator of the
> >semi dual space concept. However, Polasek is turning it into
> >full fledge dual space by stating how hydrogens have dual
> >space counterpart right to the proton.
> >
> >Anyway. QED has upgraded and no longer follow Dirac negative
> >sea of electron thing.
> >
> >Let's focus on the electric field for now. QED says electric
> >field is composed of virtual photons.
> No
> >And the origin is
> >relativistic.
> Not relevant.
> >Now how do you tie up the quantum vacuum with
> >this mysterious thing called electric field?? Let's focus on
> >this so as not to diverge too much. An electron is a point
> >particle... how could it have extension in the space surrounding
> >it in terms of electric field??
> An electron moving through space thinks it's in a vacuum and despite
> its self-charge, goes unimpeded. In Dual Space, his twin
anti-electron
> would go whizzing through the density of Espace pairs, similarly
> unimpeded. So far no electric field to speak of.
> Put a pair of "voltaged" electrodes in space and they store static
> energy in the gap. Their image in Espace polarizes enclosed pairs,
> storing the energy as the springlike deflection .5Kx^2, where K =
> 2.6e14N/m.
> >Some went so far to claim the
> >electric field is primary and the particle is just effect a
> >relativistic effect of it. If you use the quantum vacuum
> >concept. What is the origin of the electric field??
> Remove the battery from the plates (above) and the retained
deflection
> of the polarized pairs is the new source of the static electric field
> that is E and D in the gap.
> This electric field originated in a battery, or if an RF antenna,
> enabled some of it to pop loose and travel at c through the Dual
> Space. Accompanying the traveling field would be H = E/Z or from
> Maxwell, curlH = eps0 Edot. I would like to make a tensor from 1/Z
but
> can't quite put it together.
> H is the result of 1/Z tensor connection to E, make no mistake, and
> let's put aside all the twaddle of pith balls and bar magnets
"getting
> it on".
> >spacers?
> >
> >Jack
> Mr. Dual Space
>
> If you have something to say, write an equation.
> If you have nothing to say, write an essay

You are saying we are immersed in a sea of electric
field?? How come it only registers a value if an electron
passes thru it? If you remove the ambient electric field,
then you are saying the electric field of an electron would
be gone and all electrostatic forces in atoms would be
lost with the elements just separating from all the
compounds and molecules (this is supposed you can
take away the ambient electric field in the quantum
vacuum)??

Another. Suppose the ocean is the ambient zero
value electric field and an ocean liner moves it.
You can see water waves being plowed. How about
the electric field in your Espace. What is the
behavior of it when an electron passes by. Is there
a similar waves being plowed behind or in the case
of supersonic airplane moving thru air, sonic boom
or other doppler effect?

Jack

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
    ... > |> own value for the electric field, ... it's as if the Sun literally ... > | lower's one stores energy that is electrically ... on how various "dual space" definitions are able to ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Dualism of Spacetime
    ... >> | Freddifix, John Polasek, look at the above.. ... >> FrediFizzx ... >full fledge dual space by stating how hydrogens have dual ... >Let's focus on the electric field for now. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Dualism of Spacetime
    ... >>>this mysterious thing called electric field?? ... >> An electron moving through space thinks it's in a vacuum and despite ... In Dual Space, his twin ... Their image in Espace polarizes enclosed pairs, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Dualism of Spacetime
    ... FrediFizzx wrote: ... > | Freddifix, John Polasek, look at the above.. ... full fledge dual space by stating how hydrogens have dual ... Let's focus on the electric field for now. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Dualism of Spacetime
    ... > | FrediFizzx wrote: ... > that both a real electron or positron will also be a ... > | Let's focus on the electric field for now. ... If you use the quantum vacuum ...
    (sci.physics)