Re: Intelligent Design?
- From: The Ghost In The Machine <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:00:04 GMT
In sci.physics, T Wake
<taswakeAt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:30:36 +0100
<rqSdnac3KraPlvPfRVnyuQ@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> <macromitch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1114483763.681731.22640@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Gravity is a push.
>> The push has a limit.
>
> What is the limit?
What indeed? Neutron stars can't get indefinitely big; at some
point one gets a singularity. Even the fact that neutron stars
exist at all is a limit; the Pauli Exclusion Principle apparently
has failed at such stress levels, which is a little puzzling to
me personally but presumably there's a theoretical physicist
about that might be able to explain it... :-)
>
>> We cannot fall at the speed of light.
>
> Prove it.
No proof possible. We have reasonably good evidence, however.
We're accelerating protons to the tera-electron-volt level
and they're still not traveling fast enough. :-)
[rest snipped]
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Intelligent Design?
- From: T Wake
- Re: Intelligent Design?
- References:
- Re: Intelligent Design?
- From: T Wake
- Re: Intelligent Design?
- From: macromitch
- Re: Intelligent Design?
- From: T Wake
- Re: Intelligent Design?
- Prev by Date: Re: Terraforming Venus will be easier
- Next by Date: Re: electron
- Previous by thread: Re: Intelligent Design?
- Next by thread: Re: Intelligent Design?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|