Re: Dynamical Systems and Expansion-Contraction
- From: "OsherD" <mdoctorow@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Apr 2005 12:59:04 -0700
>>From Osher Doctorow
Let's take a very simple example.
The uniform marginal cdf on the interval [a, b] or (a, b) is:
1) FX(x) = (x - a)/(b - a)
Depending on a and b (constants or "parameters"), a different member of
the uniform family is invovled. Let's call FX1 the uniform marginal on
[0, 1] so that a = 0, b = 1, and let's call FX2 the uniform marginal on
[0, b] or (0, b) for arbitrary positive b. Let's examine when we
have:
2) FX1(x) > = FX2(x)
which says:
3) x > x/b
since (x - 0)/(1 - 0) = x and (x - 0)/(b - 0) is x/b.
If we restrict x to (0, 1), then dividing both sides of (3) by x
yields:
4) 1 > 1/b
and multiplying both sides by b > 0 yields:
5) b > 1
Therefore, for b > 1, FX1 on (0, 1) > = FX2 on (0, b).
The same idea can be used for bivariate cdfsF(x, y) and for pdfs fX(x),
f(x, y), etc.
Osher Doctorow
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dynamical Systems and Expansion-Contraction
- From: OsherD
- Re: Dynamical Systems and Expansion-Contraction
- References:
- Dynamical Systems and Expansion-Contraction
- From: OsherD
- Re: Dynamical Systems and Expansion-Contraction
- From: OsherD
- Re: Dynamical Systems and Expansion-Contraction
- From: OsherD
- Re: Dynamical Systems and Expansion-Contraction
- From: OsherD
- Re: Dynamical Systems and Expansion-Contraction
- From: OsherD
- Re: Dynamical Systems and Expansion-Contraction
- From: OsherD
- Re: Dynamical Systems and Expansion-Contraction
- From: OsherD
- Re: Dynamical Systems and Expansion-Contraction
- From: OsherD
- Dynamical Systems and Expansion-Contraction
- Prev by Date: Re: Foiffant! (was: Gasflow along surface)
- Next by Date: Re: Will A380 fly tomoorow? Place your bets!
- Previous by thread: Re: Dynamical Systems and Expansion-Contraction
- Next by thread: Re: Dynamical Systems and Expansion-Contraction
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading