Re: electron
- From: John Sefton <vegan16@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:23:32 -0600
Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote:
patrick wrote:
No. Im not thinking of the Bohr model at all.
If you do a measurement of the electrons position in the Hydrogen atom it is found where it is predicted to be using the Schrodinger equation.
A lot of the time you find it at the Bohr radius ,sometimes near nucleus.
So Im wondering when a measurement is not done is the electron spinning around in some unknown classical orbit.
Where would the force necessary for such an orbit come from? In a Coulomb potential, the only possible *classical* bound orbits are ellipses. And there is lots of evidence that the electrons do *not* move on ellipses.
Such as? What are the assumptions?
So are you saying the electron doesn't move?This would not contravene anything directly in QM as far as I can see.
Are you aware that a movement on an orbit would involve accelerations?
(hint: acceleration means change in velocity; hence if the speed stays the same, but the direction of movement changes, that's also an acceleration.
Are you also aware that accelerated charged particles give off electromagnetic radiation?
So accelerating an electron proves it wasn't already accelerating?
Are you also aware that if the electron gave off electromagnetic radiation when it is in the ground state,Perhaps this energy is drawn in as gravity and replaced?
1) this would have been observed
2) it would lose energy all the time and hence the ground state would not be stable?
Whether this would be consistent with hydogen spectra and so on Im not sure.
Probably is.
It isn't.
[snip]
Bye, Bjoern
Are you saying an electron doesn't move? Or are you saying it just *appears* here and there? )Please, God, don't let it be #2!(
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: electron
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
- Re: electron
- From: macromitch
- Re: electron
- References:
- electron
- From: patrick
- Re: electron
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
- Re: electron
- From: patrick
- Re: electron
- From: tadchem
- Re: electron
- From: patrick
- Re: electron
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
- electron
- Prev by Date: Re: theoretical physics for Albert Einstein and Stephen Hawking to read
- Next by Date: Re: Changing speed in gravity not explained BUSTED
- Previous by thread: Re: electron
- Next by thread: Re: electron
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|