Re: electron

"Bjoern Feuerbacher" <feuerbac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:d4q4ij$s72$3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> mountain man wrote:
>> "Bjoern Feuerbacher" <feuerbac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:d4oar9$h51$4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>>mountain man wrote:
>>>
>>>>"patrick" <networkone@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Or other possibilities?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>http://www.quantummatter.com/point.html
>>>>Galilean Electrodynamics 6
>>>>No. 5, October 1995, pages 83-91
>>>>(updated 15 May 1998)
>>>>Milo Wolff.
>>>
>>>Mr. Wolff is free to explain experimental results like Bhabha scattering
>>>or the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron based on his model. But
>>>he doesn't care for experimental evidence, right?
>>
>>
>>
>> So what existent experimental evidence invalidates
>> the model of the electron outlined by Wolff?
>
> As I said: he is free to explain the available experimental results on the
> behaviour of electrons, like Bhabha scattering, the anomalous magnetic
> moment etc. As long as he has not achieved that, his model is simply
> experimentally unsupported.


His model is quite capable in explaining these and many
other phenomena that are not covered by one *single*
theory. Have you checked his claims at:
http://www.quantummatter.com/point.html



> OTOH, QED explains all of that quantitatively, with *very* good accuracy,
> based essentially on the assumption of a point-like electron.

All experiments to probe the central structure of an electron
have been negative, so this assumption is not looking good.

No QM theory exists that predicts the size for the electron,
a mass, nor a charge.

Bjoern, you should note that the original post provided for
the explanation of QM, and a third option was classified as
"other possibilities" related to the electron.








Pete Brown
Falls Creek
Oz
www.mountainman.com.au





.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: electron
    ... >> Milo Wolff. ... > Mr. Wolff is free to explain experimental results like Bhabha scattering ... > or the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron based on his model. ... So what existent experimental evidence invalidates ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Radius of electron
    ... Harold, you don't even know what the model is, apart from ... >experimental evidence without requiring infinite density. ... the upper limit on the electron radius gives you an electron mass ... >of the proton, then they would find that the proton was a point particle ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Radius of electron
    ... Harold, you don't even know what the model is, apart from ... >experimental evidence without requiring infinite density. ... the upper limit on the electron radius gives you an electron mass ... >of the proton, then they would find that the proton was a point particle ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: "archaic" view of atom structure
    ... I was told that the view of an atom as a nucleus ... > The only thing preventing the electron from falling into ... do you have experimental evidence to enshore that you have ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: electron
    ... * the mysterious charge cut-off of QED ... > Bhabha scattering are mentioned ... That the electron is point-like? ... > The original post was about how the electron behaves in the ground state ...
    (sci.physics)