Re: electron
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:59:55 +0200
patrick wrote:
[snip]
Bjoern
In Beiser Concepts of Modern Physics (an old edition) is done a calculation for the electron in Hydrogen atom.
How? What line of reasoning does he use in the calculation?
The average x postion is shown to be a constant over time.
Averaged over what?
This would put the electron in a stationary position.
Huh? Just because the *average* position is constant does not imply that there is a "stationary position".
And would rule out any kind of orbit.This would be consistent with what you have been saying and no radiation would result.
This vision of electrons in a bunch of H atoms sitting in stationary positions all at different fixed positions indefinitely (until observed/measured) sounds a bit strange.
I repeat: don't try to envision electrons as little balls. Doesn't work.
The picture you first presented (electrons made up of very many small
subparticles which whizz around in the atom) is (IMO) the one which comes closest to what's actually going on; analogous to picturing the electron as a "charge cloud" in the atom. You can use this picture
as long as you remember that it's only an analogy used for visualization, that there are not *really* myriads of small subparticles whizzing around there.
Classically one expects them to just drop into the nucleus.
The other possibility is the the electrons dont exist at any position until they are observed which seems a bit less strange.
Yes, that's very close to what QM actually says. Unfortunately, this is not easily visualizable.
Did you get my book recommendation? Styer, "The strange world of QM"
Bye, Bjoern .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: electron
- From: patrick
- Re: electron
- From: patrick
- Re: electron
- References:
- electron
- From: patrick
- Re: electron
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
- Re: electron
- From: patrick
- Re: electron
- From: tadchem
- Re: electron
- From: patrick
- Re: electron
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
- Re: electron
- From: John Sefton
- Re: electron
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
- Re: electron
- From: patrick
- electron
- Prev by Date: Re: electron
- Next by Date: Maxwell's Wheel ?
- Previous by thread: Re: electron
- Next by thread: Re: electron
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|