Re: 2nd clarification of Burris's Unified field theory

reactor1967@xxxxxxxxx wrote: 
Well again people had a hard time understanding me so I again went back
and tried to write more clearly. The saying that you can please some of
the people some of the time but not all of the people all of the time
is true. Im not going to post my copyrighted material but I will post
my links to the pic graphicly and with text depicting my theory. Here
you go.

http://members.fortunecity.com/reactor1967/btheory.jpg
or
http://www.geocities.com/reactor1967/btheory.jpg

Others have already pointed out (repeatedly) that what you have is not a theory in the scientific sense. So drop the word.

Additionally, you apparently don't discuss "fields" anywhere. So why do you call this a unified *field* theory? Do you even know what "field" actually means in physics?

The "unified" you can keep in the title. ;-)


Bye,
Bjoern


.

Quantcast