Re: electron
- From: "patrick" <networkone@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:53:41 +0100
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bjoern Feuerbacher" <feuerbac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 10:59 AM
Subject: Re: electron
> patrick wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>
>> Bjoern
>> In Beiser Concepts of Modern Physics (an old edition) is done a
>> calculation for the electron in Hydrogen atom.
>
> How? What line of reasoning does he use in the calculation?
>
>
>> The average x postion is shown to be a constant over time.
>
> Averaged over what?
This is his calculation:
Considering only the x coordinate:
x_average=Integral{ x PSI PSI*}dx where PSI is the nornmalized wave
function.
For a quantum number n and energy E_n the time dependant wave function
PSI_n=psi_n exp{-(2pi iE_n/h)t }.
He substitutes PSI_n into x_average and gets
x_average=Integral{x PSI_n PSI_n*}dx
=Integral{x psi_n psi_n*}dx
which is constant since psi_n and psi_n* are functions of position only.The
electron does not oscillate and no radiation occurs.So an atom in a specific
quatum state does not radiate.
He goes on to show how in a jump from E_m to E_n that an atom radiates
during the transition at the predicted frequency (E_m-E_n)/h by showing
x_average varies with time during the transition.
Hence my conclusion of stationary electron.
patrick
[snip]
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: electron
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
- Re: electron
- References:
- electron
- From: patrick
- Re: electron
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
- Re: electron
- From: patrick
- Re: electron
- From: tadchem
- Re: electron
- From: patrick
- Re: electron
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
- Re: electron
- From: John Sefton
- Re: electron
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
- Re: electron
- From: patrick
- Re: electron
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
- electron
- Prev by Date: Re: Question to greywolf42 wrt French's study
- Next by Date: Re: Hubble Telescope - Sell it
- Previous by thread: Re: electron
- Next by thread: Re: electron
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|