Re: The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light

In article <4272590C.A30935FC@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Uncle Al
<UncleAl0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Weiv wrote:
>>
>> The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light
>[snip lines of ignorant crap]
>
>Hey fuckwad, c = 299,792,458 m/s EXACTLY.

The problem is, you ***-sucking sack of ***, is that measuring c is
like using a ruler to measure itself. Whether or not the ruler expands
or shrinks makes not difference: it's always the same result. Why?
Because c is an inherent part of the mechanism used by our measuring
instruments. Don't you dare deny this, fuckface.

This is the reason that c is always the same regardless of our frame
of reference. And certain not because it is actually invariant
underneath.

So get a fucking clue, you fudge-packing pederast. I swear! Physics is
so much fun.

Louis Savain

The Silver Bullet: Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix it
http://users.adelphia.net/~lilavois/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.

Quantcast