Re: The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light

"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:42726F8B.1FF1D866@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >Weiv wrote:
>> >> The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light
>> >[snip lines of ignorant crap]
>> >
>> In article <4272590C.A30935FC@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Uncle Al
>> <UncleAl0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >Hey fuckwad, c = 299,792,458 m/s EXACTLY.
>>
> Traveler wrote:
>> The problem is, you ***-sucking sack of ***, is that measuring c is
>> like using a ruler to measure itself. Whether or not the ruler expands
>> or shrinks makes not difference: it's always the same result. Why?
>> Because c is an inherent part of the mechanism used by our measuring
>> instruments. Don't you dare deny this, fuckface.
> [snip crap]
>
[Al]
> Lightspeed is a defined constant. No measurement.
> DING!!! Savain DING!!!
>
[hanson]
No measurement for c? ........
657,000 google hits for / Measuring the Velocity of Light /
2,620,000 google hits for / Measuring Light speed. /
Mucho, mucho DINGs, Al .... ahahaha... AHAHAHA... but,
No, Zero, Silch, 0 google hits for "Lightspeed is a defined constant"
DING!!!, DING!!!, DING???... or what?
ahaha... ahahanson





.

Quantcast