Re: The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light

Traveler wrote:
>
> In article <42726F8B.1FF1D866@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Uncle Al
> <UncleAl0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >Traveler wrote:
> >>
> >> In article <4272590C.A30935FC@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Uncle Al
> >> <UncleAl0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Weiv wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light
> >> >[snip lines of ignorant crap]
> >> >
> >> >Hey fuckwad, c = 299,792,458 m/s EXACTLY.
> >>
> >> The problem is, you ***-sucking sack of ***, is that measuring c is
> >> like using a ruler to measure itself. Whether or not the ruler expands
> >> or shrinks makes not difference: it's always the same result. Why?
> >> Because c is an inherent part of the mechanism used by our measuring
> >> instruments. Don't you dare deny this, fuckface.
> >[snip crap]
> >
> >Lightspeed is a defined constant. No measurement.
>
> This would be funny if it weren't so fucking pathetic. I guess they
> got the 299,792,458 m/s out of your fucking ass. But then again, I
> don't think so since you're a fudge-packing pederast. :-D

Lightspeed is a DEFINED constant, idiot Savain. It is EXACT.

http://physics.nist.gov./cgi-bin/cuu/Value?c|search_for=all!

DING!!! idiot Savain DING!!!

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.