Re: The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light

In article <42728969.E8D139E7@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Uncle Al
<UncleAl0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Traveler wrote:
>>
>> In article <42726F8B.1FF1D866@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Uncle Al
>> <UncleAl0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> >Traveler wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In article <4272590C.A30935FC@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Uncle Al
>> >> <UncleAl0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Weiv wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light
>> >> >[snip lines of ignorant crap]
>> >> >
>> >> >Hey fuckwad, c = 299,792,458 m/s EXACTLY.
>> >>
>> >> The problem is, you ***-sucking sack of ***, is that measuring c is
>> >> like using a ruler to measure itself. Whether or not the ruler expands
>> >> or shrinks makes not difference: it's always the same result. Why?
>> >> Because c is an inherent part of the mechanism used by our measuring
>> >> instruments. Don't you dare deny this, fuckface.
>> >[snip crap]
>> >
>> >Lightspeed is a defined constant. No measurement.
>>
>> This would be funny if it weren't so fucking pathetic. I guess they
>> got the 299,792,458 m/s out of your fucking ass. But then again, I
>> don't think so since you're a fudge-packing pederast. :-D
>
>Lightspeed is a DEFINED constant, idiot Savain. It is EXACT.
>
>http://physics.nist.gov./cgi-bin/cuu/Value?c|search_for=all!

What a fucking moron your are, Uncle Al! There are many constants in
physics such as c, e, and h. Defined or not, they still have to be
measured, you imbecilic asswipe. You really are a stupid motherfucker.
I always knew it. .... ahahaha... AHAHAHA... (thanks Hanson).

Louis Savain

The Silver Bullet: Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix it
http://users.adelphia.net/~lilavois/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.