Re: The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light

JM Albuquerque wrote:
>
> "Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu na mensagem
> news:4272A19C.20E8563D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > Traveler wrote:
>
> (snip)
>
> > >
> > > Makes no difference, fuckface. It still has to be measured, and very
> > > carefully.
> >
> > Lightspeed is a DEFINED constant, idiot Savain. It is EXACT.
> > http://physics.nist.gov./cgi-bin/cuu/Value?c|search_for=all!
> > DING!!! idiot Savain DING!!!
>
> Makes no difference, Uncle Al. It still has to be measured, and very
> carefully.
> Unfortunately, only light frequency is possible to measure.
> Nobody ever measured the speed of light propagation in open
> space because it requires an engineering tool that could run
> information faster then the speed of light.
>
> I notice that Savian puts you straight in line, along with all the other
> fuckface around here.
> It looks like that the only way to deal with parrots is "à la Savian".

Lightspeed is a DEFINED constant, idiot. It is EXACT. It is *any*
arbitrary value assigned as long as the rest of physics marches in
step.

http://physics.nist.gov./cgi-bin/cuu/Value?c|search_for=all!

Idiot.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.